The capital letter of όμικρον o mikron [O] is an ancient greek number equal to the modern number 70 and not a Roman numeral which is LXX.
It is known the translation of the Old Testament by the 72 Alexandria's wise men which is annotated as "the translation of the O".
That's not a roman numeral. C is a hundred, but O and R are not a part of the Roman counting system.
Z is not a Roman numeral. The Roman numerals are I, V, X, L, C, D, M.
The Roman numeral MMCLXIV represents the number 2164
d or D is a Roman numeral equivalent to 500
The roman numeral of Alexander the Great is Alexander III [356-323 BCE]
o The Roman Numeral of CCXCI is CCXCI. What a silly question! The answer of CCXCI=291
No, the number 0 does not have a corresponding Roman numeral. Roman numerals were developed by the ancient Romans and do not include a representation for the concept of zero.
The word LOVE does not form a valid Roman numeral. The letters O and E are used in the Roman numeral system.
It is O because it's not needed in the Roman numeral system for place value purposes as the place value of the numerals are self evident
That's not a roman numeral. C is a hundred, but O and R are not a part of the Roman counting system.
the answer to what is the roman numeral for 101 is CI
XXV is the Roman Numeral for 25
324 written in roman numeral is CCCXXIV
No, K is not a roman numeral.
There is not a Roman Numeral for 0.
The roman numeral for one is I.
Vivid is not a Roman numeral