0
Is it true that without the Industrial Revolution the 'new imperialism' would not have been possible I would appreciate both sides of the arguments?
Without the Industrial Revolution, there could have been no massive "Imperialism", no empire building, throughout the world. That's because without the Industrial Revolution, most people would have continued to die young, of starvation, because one of the things that the Industrial Revolution brought was mechanized agriculture and the ability to feed far more people than your own country.
Without the Industrial Revolution, there would have been no trains, or steamships, or powered machinery. No airplanes, no telecommunications, no electricity. No modern hospitals, no modern medicine.
Thomas Hobbs said it best, in 1651 in his book "Leviathan"; "Whatsoever therefore is consequent to a time of Warre, where every man is Enemy to every man; the same is consequent to the time, wherein men live without other security, than what their own strength, and their own invention shall furnish them withall. In such condition, there is no place for Industry; because the fruit thereof is uncertain; and consequently no Culture of the Earth; no Navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by Sea; no commodious Building; no Instruments of moving, and removing such things as require much force; no Knowledge of the face of the Earth; no account of Time; no Arts; no Letters; no Society; and which is worst of all, continuall feare, and danger of violent death; And the life of man, solitary, poore, nasty, brutish, and short."
The Industrial Revolution has effects both good and bad. Since I'l well past the age at which that those "primitive" men died, I think the good has outweighed the bad.
What else can I help you with?
What were China's strengths that debunk arguments for why the Industrial Revolution started in Europe?
China had several strengths that challenge the notion that the Industrial Revolution could only have begun in Europe. Firstly, it possessed advanced technologies, such as early mechanized textile production and sophisticated metallurgy, well before Europe’s industrialization. Additionally, China's vast population and established trade networks facilitated innovation and economic activity, demonstrating that it had the capacity for industrial growth. Furthermore, the Ming and Qing dynasties showcased significant agricultural productivity and urbanization, indicating a robust foundation for industrial development that was ultimately stifled by political and social factors rather than a lack of potential.
Was Albert J Beveridge an Anti-Imperialist?
NO. Beveridge was known as a strong Imperialist and actively supported American expansion and Imperialism. His arguments were very similar to Rudyard Kipling's "White Man's Burden" and Social Darwinism in terms of why he justified the expansion of American power.
What were the key arguments for and against U.S imperialism?
against: -to annex colonies would violate the "consent of the governed" philosophy in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. -Despotism abroad might well beget despotism at home. -Imperialism was costly and was unlikely to turn into a profit. -annexation would propel the U.S. into the political and military cauldron of East Asia. For: -played possible trade profits. -"civilizing mission"
What did the naval act of 1890 call for?
Basically, the Naval Act of 1890 was passed by Congress to grant money for construction of more naval ships. At the time, imperialism and the new Manifest Destiny were big in America. These are the types of arguments Congress used to justify the act.
Why were minuteman called minuteman?
It is from the American revolution, when the British intruded Lexington and Concord, the Colonists only had about a minute to get all their weapons ready.
What are admiral mahan's arguments in favor of American imperialism?
Admiral Mahan's arguments were that our growing production needs this, we need ways to respond quickly, and that we need to be closer. :)
The effort to annex Hawaii in 1893 foreshadowed?
the arguments over imperialism at the end of the century and emphasized the policy differences between the Republicans and the Democrats.
What arguments against imperialism have been raised by Ferry's critics How does he counter them?
You need to answer this question because we don't do homework. You have the item you read and we don't.
What are the key appeals on which the writers of the American Revolution based their arguments?
Logic, emotion and morality
What were China's strengths that debunk arguments for why the Industrial Revolution started in Europe?
China had several strengths that challenge the notion that the Industrial Revolution could only have begun in Europe. Firstly, it possessed advanced technologies, such as early mechanized textile production and sophisticated metallurgy, well before Europe’s industrialization. Additionally, China's vast population and established trade networks facilitated innovation and economic activity, demonstrating that it had the capacity for industrial growth. Furthermore, the Ming and Qing dynasties showcased significant agricultural productivity and urbanization, indicating a robust foundation for industrial development that was ultimately stifled by political and social factors rather than a lack of potential.
What are your arguments for or against the use of imperialism as a factor in a nation's foreign policy?
ummm so like ask that question more clearly and it shall be answered word of the wise
What contributed most to the growing gap between social classes during the indutrial revolution?
Answer this question… An increase in both low-skilled manufacturing jobs and high-skilled middle-class jobs
Was Albert J Beveridge an Anti-Imperialist?
NO. Beveridge was known as a strong Imperialist and actively supported American expansion and Imperialism. His arguments were very similar to Rudyard Kipling's "White Man's Burden" and Social Darwinism in terms of why he justified the expansion of American power.
What arguments have been advanced to justify the European take over of societies in Asia and Africa during the latter part of the nineteenth century To what degree are such arguments justified?
During the latter part of the nineteenth century, European powers justified their takeover of Asian and African societies through a combination of economic, political, and cultural arguments. They claimed to be bringing "civilization," democracy, and progress to "backward" societies, often framing their actions as a moral obligation to uplift these populations, known as the "White Man's Burden." Additionally, the quest for resources and markets to fuel industrial growth played a significant role in justifying imperialism. However, these arguments are largely seen as flawed and self-serving, as they often masked the exploitative and violent realities of colonization, undermining the rich cultures and societies they purported to "civilize."
What arguments did Rudyard Kipling use to justify western imperialism in Asia and Africa?
Rudyard Kipling justified Western imperialism in Asia and Africa through the concept of the "White Man's Burden," suggesting that it was the duty of Western powers to civilize and uplift supposedly 'backward' societies. He argued that imperialism was a noble endeavor, bringing progress, education, and governance to colonized peoples. Kipling also emphasized the supposed racial superiority of Western cultures, portraying colonial rule as beneficial for both the colonizers and the colonized, despite the often exploitative realities of imperialism.
What were the key arguments for and against U.S imperialism?
against: -to annex colonies would violate the "consent of the governed" philosophy in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. -Despotism abroad might well beget despotism at home. -Imperialism was costly and was unlikely to turn into a profit. -annexation would propel the U.S. into the political and military cauldron of East Asia. For: -played possible trade profits. -"civilizing mission"
What are the formal arguments?
Formal arguments are the named arguments defined by the function. Actual arguments are those arguments that were passed to the function by the caller.
