0
What else can I help you with?
Why did slaveholders claim the wilmot proviso was unconstitutional?
Slaveholders opposed the Wilmot Proviso because Slaveholders argued that slaves were property by the Constitution
Slaveholders continually indoctrinated their slaves with the idea of?
the God-ordained supremacy of whites.
What belief inspired Nat Turner to lead a group of slaves to kill slaveholders?
He believed that God had told him to end slavery.
Did white southern slaveholders believe slaves were inferior and needed white guardianship?
Yes, they did. Whites believed that slaves were incapable of living on their own and taking care of themselves. Slave owners saw it as their duty to watch over the slaves.
What could slaveholders do legally with their property?
They could do anything they wanted. Slaves were property and didn't have any rights or legal protection from laws or the government.
What did slaveholders justified their ownership of slaves by claiming?
slavery was common in the bible
How did former slaves and former slaveholders disagree after slavery ended?
Former slaves and former slaveholders often disagreed over issues such as land ownership, labor rights, and equality. Former slaves sought land ownership and economic independence, while former slaveholders resisted granting them full rights and opportunities. These disagreements contributed to ongoing tensions and conflicts in the Reconstruction era.
Why did slaveholder try to convince poor whites that slaves was justified?
Slaveholders tried to convince poor whites that slavery was justified to maintain social order and prevent potential alliances between poor whites and slaves that could threaten the existing power structure. By promoting the idea that whites were superior and deserved more rights and privileges than slaves, slaveholders aimed to divide and control the lower classes to safeguard their own economic interests.
Why did slaveholders try to convince poor and whites that slavery was justified?
Slaveholders wanted to create a united front among all white people to maintain their power and control over slaves. By convincing poor and whites that slavery was justified, they aimed to prevent any potential alliances or uprisings that could threaten the institution of slavery. Additionally, promoting the idea of white superiority helped to uphold a social hierarchy that benefited the slaveholders economically and socially.
How do you think slaveholders were able to justify slavery to themselves?
Slaveholders often justified slavery by viewing slaves as property rather than people, citing economic reasons to maintain the institution, portraying slaves as inferior and in need of guidance, and using religious or cultural beliefs to justify their actions. Additionally, societal norms and customs at the time perpetuated and supported slavery, making it easier for slaveholders to rationalize their actions.
Why did slaveholders claim the wilmot proviso was unconstitutional?
Slaveholders opposed the Wilmot Proviso because Slaveholders argued that slaves were property by the Constitution
In what different ways did slaveholders obedience from their slaves?
the different ways that slaveholders encouraged obedience from their slaves was to offer them more food and better living conditions.
How did landowners explain that owning slaves was all right?
Landowners justified owning slaves by claiming that it was necessary for the economy and their way of life. They argued that slaves were inferior and in need of their guidance, and that it was their duty to provide for and protect them. They also used religious and philosophical arguments to support the idea that slavery was justified and natural.
Why did slaveholders try to convince poor whites that slavery was justfied?
Slaveholders wanted poor whites to feel superior to slaves, so that they would not unite with slaves to challenge the existing power structure. By convincing poor whites that they were better than slaves, slaveholders ensured that their control over slaves remained unchallenged. Additionally, slaveholders sought to maintain social order and stability by preventing potential uprisings or rebellions.
How did landowners explain that owning slaves was alright?
Landowners justified owning slaves by claiming that they were providing care, shelter, and sustenance to individuals who they believed were incapable of taking care of themselves. They also argued that slave ownership was sanctioned by religious beliefs or that it was a traditional practice that was deeply ingrained in society. Finally, they believed that slavery was essential for the economy and that it granted them a higher social status.
What was arguments used by southern slaveholders to justify the institution of slavery?
Southern slaveholders justified slavery using arguments based on economics, religion, and racial superiority. They argued that slavery was necessary for maintaining the Southern economy, that slaves were better off under their care, and that Africans were racially inferior and thus suited for servitude.
How was the fugitive slave act biased in favor of slaveholders?
The lawyers that would go around looking for the fugitive slaves would get more money when they had there court case if they were a slave then a free black man, therefore they would make majority of them slaves to get more money
