answersLogoWhite

0

the operation of inborn universal grammar

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What do Nativists theorists believe that language is acquired and produced primarily through?

Nativist theorists believe that language is primarily acquired and produced through innate linguistic capabilities and structures that are hard-wired in the human brain. This perspective suggests that humans are genetically predisposed to develop language skills without the need for extensive external input or learning.


How do the learning theory and nativist perspective on language development differ?

The learning theory posits that language is acquired through exposure and reinforcement, suggesting that it is a learned behavior. In contrast, the nativist perspective emphasizes that humans are biologically predisposed to acquire language, known as the Language Acquisition Device, suggesting that language acquisition is an innate ability.


What is the nativist view of language acquisition?

The Nativist view of language acquisition is that it is innate. Language learning is not something that a child does, it is something that happens to a child placed in an appropriate environment.


Identify two different theories of language development?

Behaviorist theory posits that language is acquired through imitation, reinforcement, and conditioning. Nativist theory argues that language acquisition is an innate capacity, with children born with an inherent ability to learn and develop language skills.


What is nativist theory?

The nativist theory deals with the biological belief that language is an innate feature of the infant. The nativist theory is where it is believed that we have an inborn ability to learn and learning is in our genetics.


The language acquisition theory that proposes the existence of a critical period for learning speech is the?

nativist view.


Who are the English language and power theorists?

Some prominent English language and power theorists include Michel Foucault, Pierre Bourdieu, and Norman Fairclough. These theorists have analyzed how language is used as a tool for exercising power and maintaining social hierarchies. They have contributed to our understanding of how language can shape and reinforce power dynamics in society.


Who is the researcher that developed the nativist approach and universal grammar to explain how children learn their language skills?

chomsky


What are the four approaches to studying language development?

The four approaches to studying language development are nativist, behaviorist, interactionist, and cognitive. Nativist perspective suggests that language acquisition is innate, behaviorist perspective emphasizes learning through reinforcement, interactionist perspective highlights social interactions as key for language development, and cognitive perspective focuses on how cognition and language development are intertwined.


While it offers compelling explanations for language development the most significant shortcoming nativist account is?

many of its claims are difficult to falsify


Children learn language very quickly based on relatively limited time spent interacting with adults This is taken as support for the nativist view of language development and is called the?

This phenomenon is called the "critical period" theory, which suggests that there is a unique window of time during early childhood when language acquisition is especially rapid and successful. The nativist view posits that humans are born with an innate capacity for language learning, which is why children are able to learn language so quickly and effortlessly.


What is nativist view of language acqisition?

The nativist view proposes that humans are born with innate biological abilities that facilitate language acquisition. This perspective suggests that the human brain is pre-wired to acquire language and that universal grammar principles guide language development. Proponents of this view, such as Noam Chomsky, argue that environmental input alone is insufficient to account for the complex nature of language acquisition, highlighting the role of genetic predispositions.