The decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki remains a deeply contentious topic. Proponents argue it was necessary to bring a swift end to World War II and save lives that would have been lost in a prolonged conflict. Critics contend it was morally indefensible and caused unnecessary suffering to civilians. Ultimately, the assessment depends on one's perspective on wartime ethics, military strategy, and the value of human life.
atomic bomb
He was not wrong.
Harry Truman drop the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima, Japan and Nagasaki, Japan.
AnswerMoral implications aside, the first bomb failed to bring about the immediate and unconditional surrender of Japan...the second one succeeded. w
if you drop a bomb on japan, ninjas will die
Most people don't think so.
Most people think so.
Drop wHeel on bomb to far right first then bomb on right side of board should be complete after that...¡
Most people think so.
I wonder that right after the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Drop the Bomb on 'Em was created in 2009.
Sure there is: What is wrong to drop the atomic bomb? That one is still going around after 65 years and will continue until another bomb is blasted over a place in the world.
atomic bomb
The only people that were against using the bomb could be counter with the fingers. Every one else wanted revenge.
He defended his descision saying it would shorten the war and lessen the U.S casulaties.
Most people think it was the proper decision.
He was not wrong.