Prisoners of war in World War 2 were not all treated the same. Here is an example of this. The German army ran the POW camps in Nazi Germany during WW2. American POW's had a Death Rate in the German camps of 4%. In contrast, the POW camps of Japan that held American POW's had a death rate of 17%. This is a remarkable difference. If anyone has seen the captured Japanese made film of the Death March of Bataan, the film shows defenseless American soldiers on this death march bayoneted by Japanese soldiers.
It's a horrible scene, as are the scenes of the Burma road manned primarily by British prisoners, or the treatment of the Chinese who lost 517,568,000 men compared to USA's 131,028,000.
The Japanese were particularly unforgiving on any prisoners that surrendered (not just Americans!) as they saw the act of capitulation as a sign of inferiority. this is also the reason that they would rather commit ritual suicide or fight against ridiculous odds before the dishonour of surrender. This social trait was used to good effect by the leaders of the Japanese imperial army to create an inhuman fighting force. more cruel and dispassionate than the Germans who had no such social code.
The best-treated prisoners during various historical contexts were often political prisoners or those with valuable skills, such as scientists or intellectuals. For example, in some instances, political prisoners were afforded better treatment to maintain a facade of humane conditions, especially when under international scrutiny. Additionally, prisoners who were essential for labor or technical expertise might receive better treatment to ensure their productivity. Ultimately, the level of treatment varied significantly depending on the political climate and the perceived value of the prisoners to the authorities.
There were 72 hostages and 72 were returned from Iran.
Take your pick: Jews, homosexuals, Eastern Europeans, the Chinese, general civilians... Acually the answer is the Jews in the European Theatre, and the American prisoners of War in the Pacific Theatre of War. The Japanese did NOT participate in the Geniva Convention, so they treated their prisoners horribly.
After the attack on Pearl Harbor (December 7, 1941) many people started discriminating against Japanese Americans because the Japanese were the people who bombed Pearl Harbor. People looked at the Japanese Americans as spies and untrustworthy. FDR saw this in people and relocated the Japanese Americans to camps in Wyoming to "protect" them. Mexicans and African Americans were not relocated and looked at as spies. People still discriminated againsts these ethnics groups but not to the lenghts as which they did to the Japanese Americans.
equality- the natives were treated differently then others( not fair equality there) rights- the African Americans had the right to do as they pleased but were forced against their will opportunity- the 49ers had the opportunity to search for gold at their own cost democracy- liberty- the mormans had the freedom to express their religion
They treated them very well
During World War II, Japanese citizens in the United States were treated differently due to widespread fear and prejudice following the attack on Pearl Harbor. This led to the belief that Japanese Americans could be potential spies or saboteurs, resulting in Executive Order 9066, which authorized the internment of around 120,000 Japanese Americans in camps. This action was rooted in racial discrimination and wartime hysteria, contrasting with how other ethnic groups, including German and Italian Americans, were treated. Ultimately, this unjust treatment has been recognized as a significant violation of civil rights in American history.
African Americans
The best-treated prisoners during various historical contexts were often political prisoners or those with valuable skills, such as scientists or intellectuals. For example, in some instances, political prisoners were afforded better treatment to maintain a facade of humane conditions, especially when under international scrutiny. Additionally, prisoners who were essential for labor or technical expertise might receive better treatment to ensure their productivity. Ultimately, the level of treatment varied significantly depending on the political climate and the perceived value of the prisoners to the authorities.
There were 72 hostages and 72 were returned from Iran.
Take your pick: Jews, homosexuals, Eastern Europeans, the Chinese, general civilians... Acually the answer is the Jews in the European Theatre, and the American prisoners of War in the Pacific Theatre of War. The Japanese did NOT participate in the Geniva Convention, so they treated their prisoners horribly.
Britain treated prisoners generally very well, but not during the moment of surrender. Soldiers trying to surrender in WWI were treated poorly by every combatant country, will high percentages being killed. Soldiers were generally safer surrendering in large groups.
Yeah, women were treated like dirt during world war 2. Men thought we were useless. But we can fight! (Not that I want to.) Good thing we have respect now.
Japanese-Americans
Japanese Americans , Blacks , Hispanics, Women, German Americans, Italian Americans
They were separated and payed a lower amount of money.
Hispanics were too but not as much blacks