0
What else can I help you with?
Do Roman senators have slaves?
The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.
Can you provide any examples where there were any good slave owners in history"?
While some individuals may have treated their enslaved people relatively better than others, the institution of slavery itself was inherently oppressive and dehumanizing. It is important to recognize that owning another human being is fundamentally wrong, regardless of any perceived kindness or benevolence shown by some slave owners.
Who were the Polish slave owners?
Upon coming to America, many Poles lived in the North, where slavery was illegal. Polish were more likely to end up as indentured servants rather than slave owners. However, many Polish Americans worked on plantations over seeing slaves, and in many circumstances would have one or two slaves which catered to an entire Polish community in the South.
How was the dred Scott decision good?
The direct answer to the question is that the Dred Scott decision was good for slave owners. In a larger sense it was not good at all. The decision by the US Supreme Court was more important to the United States than it was to slave holder Dred Scott. This was so because in an 1857 Supreme Court decision, slaves in the United States, whether in bondage or freed men & women, could never be US citizens. This decision was a setback for the antislavery abolitionists and a victory of sorts for slave owners. Taken in its totality it was a setback for the United States as a whole. The above answer is correct, however, if there was "good" in the Dredd Scott decision it was that the US Supreme Court made it clear what its position on slavery was. Thereby giving opponents of slavery ground to stand on in their efforts to limit or abolish slavery.
The slave always knows more about the master than the master knows about the slave?
The slave always knows more about the master for several reasons. It is beneficial to the slave's survival to know everything about the master such as what the master wants, how he thinks and acts, and more.
Do Roman senators have slaves?
The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.
How did slave owners get new slaves?
The purchased them at slave auctions. Owners that had more slaves than they needed, and those bringing them from Africa would sell them at slave markets.
Should schools named for slave owners be renamed?
no the should not. They did more for our country than worsen the slave trade
What did the Southern slave owners eat wear etc?
They ate more than the slaves!!
Why were slaves in Haiti treated worse than in America?
The French slave owners in Haiti had made a business decision that it was cheaper to treat slaves badly and then replace them with new slaves after they were worked to death, whereas American slave owners generally found it more profitable to keep their slaves in relatively good condition and thereby get more work out of them.
The practice by which slave owners emancipated the slaves was known as .?
The practice by which slave owners emancipated their slaves was known as "manumission." This process allowed slave owners to grant freedom to individual slaves, often as a reward for loyalty, service, or other reasons. Manumission varied by region and was more common in some areas than others, influenced by social, economic, and legal factors.
Why did slave owners give their slaves their last name?
Slave owners gave their slaves their last name to assert ownership over them and to reinforce the slaves' status as property rather than individuals. This practice also helped slave owners keep track of their slaves and maintain control over their lives.
Why would owners of large plantations rather have slaves than indentured servants?
Since slavery lasted a lifetime, a slave provided more years of work.
Why would owners of large plantations rather slaves than indentured servants?
Since slavery lasted a lifetime, a slave provided more years of work.
Why would owners of large plantations rather have slaves than indentured slaves?
Since slavery lasted a lifetime, a slave provided more years of work.
Southern slave owners criticized factory owners in the North because?
Type your answer here... free factory workers were treated worse than slaves.
Could slaves in the Arab world convert to Islam?
Yes. They could convert to Islam, but this was generally discouraged by the slave-owners because it was seen as less legitimate to hold a Muslim as a slave than a Non-Muslim and slave-owners were generally opposed to the manumission of their "property".
