They both suck. Also the usa had to put up with it.
Well, because Darfus does drops bombs (like Hiroshima), it might seem like you could compare his destruction to that of the holocaust. Buit the truth of the matter is that Darfus would own Hitler. Because Hitler was a f**king tool.
The Armenian genocide and the Holocaust were similar in that people were tortured and killed because of their nationality. There were often no other reason than someone being Armenian, or Jewish, just because of that there were those who thought they should die.
It is difficult to say which of the 2 events between the Rwandan genocide or the Holocaust was worst. Both events were atrocious and in both events innocent people died and suffered. In the Holocaust a lot more people died than in the Rwandan genocide, 6 million as opposed to about 1 million, but the Rwandan genocide was a lot shorter than the Holocaust. In events like this you can't say which event was worse than the other one, both were equally bad and nothing like either of these events should ever happen again.
It does not, there was no national policy to gather African Americans together, no policy to eliminate them from society. There are similarities between the Holocaust and the experience of American aboriginals though.
The Herero Genocide was a genocide that was fought between Namibia and the Germans
There isn't really any difference, the Holocaust just refers to the genocide of the Jews during WW2, so the Holocaust was a genocide, it just refers to a specific one.
no
There is no difference between the two, the Holocaust just refers to the genocide of the Jews during WW2.
Well, because Darfus does drops bombs (like Hiroshima), it might seem like you could compare his destruction to that of the holocaust. Buit the truth of the matter is that Darfus would own Hitler. Because Hitler was a f**king tool.
Both the Holocaust and the East Timor genocide involved the systematic targeting and mass murder of specific groups, resulting in significant loss of life and widespread suffering. The Holocaust primarily targeted Jews, along with other minority groups, under Nazi Germany, while the East Timor genocide involved the Indonesian military's campaign against the Timorese population following the invasion of East Timor in 1975. A key difference lies in the scale and context; the Holocaust was executed with industrial efficiency and ideology aimed at racial purity, whereas the East Timor genocide was driven by political motives and territorial control. Additionally, the Holocaust has received extensive global recognition and study, while the East Timor genocide has garnered comparatively less international attention.
Genocide refers to the mass murder (systematic destruction) in whole or in part of any ethnic, racial, religious, or national group. The Holocaust was Adolf Hitler's attempt at genocide of all Jews. Hitler was trying to keep pure what he believed was the perfect race. (Aryan race)
Almost none: They both involved death, that's about it for similarities. The Rape of Nanking was a single action, the Holocaust was a collections of actions. The motivations for them were different, and so forth.
The Holocaust. ______ The Holocaust refers to the actual genocide, not to the period and not to World War 2. Many Jews call it the Shoah.
The Holocaust is not related to the war in Darfur. One can find similarities between any events in history, it does not make them related.
A very little difference between holocaust or genocide. Its the same. Killing of innocent people. People raise their voice, so someone, somewhere, sometime will listen..and raise his (her) or their voice.
its nothing really just really stupid
The commonality is the fact that a genocide was perpetrated. An ethnoreligious minority was targeted by a national army with the goal of exterminating those people and millions were wiped off of the face of the planet.