1st Answer:
They didn't and they worked pretty much hand in hand. It wasn't until the late 1300's and the 1400's that there was any problems. If you are thinking of Henry VIII, he isn't in the middle ages. He was much later.
2nd Answer:
There were many clashes between religious authorities and political rulers during the Middle Ages, including the Investiture Controversy in the 11th and 12th centuries, the events surrounding the Great Schism of the West in the 14th and 15th centuries, the events surrounding the death of Thomas Becket in 1190, and a number of others. They started early on, under the Roman Empire, in fact, and never really disappeared.
These problems were all about power. The kings and emperors wanted to be able to appoint bishops who would do their bidding; the bishops and popes wanted to keep monarchs out of Church business. The clergy had rights the Church wanted to protect, such as the benefits of clergy, which meant that clergy who got into trouble with the law were tried by the Church instead of the state; the kings wanted the Church out of their business. The kings were limited in their taxation because the Church controlled a large amount of wealth, but was exempt from taxation in many places; the Church wanted to stay tax free. There were a number of other issues, but it all boiled down to a question of power, keeping power, or gaining power.
There are links below.
Three key causes of conflict between national monarchies and the Catholic Church during the Middle Ages include the struggle for power over appointments of bishops and church officials, the varying interpretations of authority and governance, and disputes over taxation and land ownership. The rise of national identity and the assertion of royal power often led monarchs to challenge papal authority. However, the promotion of education and literacy by the Church did not cause such conflicts; instead, it often supported the Church's influence and role in society.
Parliament might oppose a Catholic monarch due to historical conflicts between Protestantism and Catholicism, particularly in England, where the monarchy played a crucial role in the establishment of the Church of England. A Catholic monarch could potentially align the monarchy with the Catholic Church, undermining the established Protestant church and threatening the religious and political stability that had been hard-won after centuries of conflict. Additionally, there were fears that a Catholic ruler might prioritize the interests of Catholic nations, which could compromise national sovereignty and security.
The negative side to increase in national pride was also displayed in the conflicts between nations over territories and trade routes.
From 1854-1861, a variety of conflicts, referred to as 'Bleeding Kansas,' occurred in the territory (and soon-to-be state) of Kansas between pro-slavery and anti-slavery Americans. These conflicts had the general effect of adding to national tensions between the South and the North and may be said to have contributed to the outbreak of the American Civil War.
A struggle for control of the Western Mediterranean between Rome and Carthage.
knowing each other's roles
national and state governments
Roman Catholic AnswerFor the main part, conflicts between protestants and Catholics have been more conflicts between different peoples who happen to be Catholic or protestant. For instance, in Ireland, the Irish, who were fighting to save their nation, all happened to be Catholic, while the English were all protestant. Other conflicts have come about because of ignorance and/or intolerance. For the most part protestants have been brought up to believe that Catholics are not Christian and are worse than pagans. This has been very unfortunate, with disastrous results in some cases. I, myself, was brought up in a protestant household and Catholic beliefs were beyond the pale. I have heard that everbody was warned at my parents wedding to not tell my mother's grandmother that the bridegroom's mother was Catholic. All very sad.
Roman Catholic AnswerFor the main part, conflicts between protestants and Catholics have been more conflicts between different peoples who happen to be Catholic or protestant. For instance, in Ireland, the Irish, who were fighting to save their nation, all happened to be Catholic, while the English were all protestant. Other conflicts have come about because of ignorance and/or intolerance. For the most part protestants have been brought up to believe that Catholics are not Christian and are worse than pagans. This has been very unfortunate, with disastrous results in some cases. I, myself, was brought up in a protestant household and Catholic beliefs were beyond the pale. I have heard that everbody was warned at my parents wedding to not tell my mother's grandmother that the bridegroom's mother was Catholic. All very sad.
Roman Catholic AnswerFor the main part, conflicts between protestants and Catholics have been more conflicts between different peoples who happen to be Catholic or protestant. For instance, in Ireland, the Irish, who were fighting to save their nation, all happened to be Catholic, while the English were all protestant. Other conflicts have come about because of ignorance and/or intolerance. For the most part protestants have been brought up to believe that Catholics are not Christian and are worse than pagans. This has been very unfortunate, with disastrous results in some cases. I, myself, was brought up in a protestant household and Catholic beliefs were beyond the pale. I have heard that everbody was warned at my parents wedding to not tell my mother's grandmother that the bridegroom's mother was Catholic. All very sad.
his diplomatic manner
Reserved powers are powers belonging to states. What can a state do?
Parliament might oppose a Catholic monarch due to historical conflicts between Protestantism and Catholicism, particularly in England, where the monarchy played a crucial role in the establishment of the Church of England. A Catholic monarch could potentially align the monarchy with the Catholic Church, undermining the established Protestant church and threatening the religious and political stability that had been hard-won after centuries of conflict. Additionally, there were fears that a Catholic ruler might prioritize the interests of Catholic nations, which could compromise national sovereignty and security.
It began as a religious war between Catholic and Protestant Christians, but it became a national war with several European nations involved. France, a Catholic country, eventually sided with the Protestants.
The negative side to increase in national pride was also displayed in the conflicts between nations over territories and trade routes.
There are several reasons for conflicts:- Team conflicts (conflicts between team members)- Schedule conflicts- Stakeholder conflicts
Most of the conflicts in the Middle East since 1918 have been directly or indirectly influenced by Imperialist Powers. These include the Israeli-Arab conflict, the Arab Nationalists vs. Monarchies conflicts in Iraq, Egypt, Tunisia, and others, border clashes between the Saudis and Iraqis/Jordanians and the Moroccans and Algerians, the Syrian-Lebanese Conflict, and the Kurdish Repression (although this was from inaction).