answersLogoWhite

0

is it america's military support of Israel in the middle eas or the support of taiwans status as independent from china or america's establishment of military bases in the Philippines subic bay or america's patrolling of waters off the libyan coast

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

Which American occupational group probably benefited the most for a us imperialist foreign policy during the late 1800 and early 1900?

Factory owners


Which American occupational group probably benefited the most from a us imperialist foreign policy during the late 1800's and early 1900's?

factory owners


What do you call a person who does not believe a nation should expand by taking over foreign lands?

an Anti-imperialist is a person who is against nations taking over foreign lands to expand


What is the relationship of Manifest Destiny to current foreign policies?

Manifest Destiny, the 19th-century belief that the United States was destined to expand across the continent, has shaped American attitudes toward foreign policy by fostering a sense of exceptionalism and entitlement. This historical mindset can be seen in contemporary policies that prioritize American interests and promote democracy and capitalism abroad. The idea of spreading democracy, often justified through interventionist policies, echoes the expansionist spirit of Manifest Destiny. However, this has also led to criticism regarding imperialism and the consequences of U.S. actions on global stability.


How Some members of the Anti-Imperialist League felt that?

Some members of the Anti-Imperialist League believed that American expansionism contradicted the nation's founding principles of self-determination and liberty. They argued that imperialism imposed foreign rule on other nations and denied them the right to govern themselves. This group included prominent figures who feared that imperial ambitions would lead the U.S. into unnecessary conflicts and undermine democratic values at home. Overall, they viewed imperialism as morally and politically unjustifiable.

Related Questions

Which American occupational group probably benefited the most for a us imperialist foreign policy during the late 1800 and early 1900?

Factory owners


Which American occupational group probably benefited the most from a us imperialist foreign policy during the late 1800's and early 1900's?

factory owners


What did members of the anti-imperialist league fell?

Members of the Anti-Imperialist League opposed American expansionism and imperialism, believing it contradicted the principles of democracy and self-determination. They argued that imperialism was morally wrong and detrimental to both the United States and the territories being annexed. The league included a diverse group of individuals, including intellectuals, politicians, and labor leaders, who feared that imperialist policies would undermine American democratic values and lead to the exploitation of foreign peoples. Ultimately, they advocated for a foreign policy based on respect for sovereignty rather than control.


What actions can lead to an American citizen losing their citizenship?

An American citizen can lose their citizenship by voluntarily renouncing it, committing treason, or serving in a foreign military.


How do you find the current rate exchange from foreign currency to American dollars?

See the related link


What do you call a person who does not believe a nation should expand by taking over foreign lands?

an Anti-imperialist is a person who is against nations taking over foreign lands to expand


What are the current issues in Nigerian insurance?

Stay away from foreign insurance. Find a reputable American insurance company.


How does U.S. imperialism in the past relate to U.S. foreign policy today?

U.S. imperialism in the past, characterized by territorial expansion and the exertion of influence over other nations, laid the groundwork for contemporary foreign policy by establishing a precedent for interventionism and global engagement. The historical context of actions such as the annexation of territories and the promotion of democracy abroad continues to shape current strategies, including military interventions and economic partnerships. Today, the U.S. often justifies its foreign policy in terms of protecting national interests, promoting stability, and supporting human rights, echoing imperialist motivations. This legacy influences perceptions of American power and its role in global affairs, often leading to debates about the ethics and consequences of interventionist policies.


What did the Anti-Imperialist League oppose intervention in Cuba?

The Anti-Imperialist League opposed intervention in Cuba primarily on the grounds of promoting self-determination and opposing imperialism. They argued that annexing territories went against American democratic principles and moral values, emphasizing that the U.S. should not impose its will on other nations. Additionally, they feared that such actions could lead to the expansion of militarism and entanglement in foreign conflicts, undermining domestic liberties. The League also highlighted the economic and ethical implications of imperialism, advocating for a focus on domestic issues instead.


How did president eisenhower's new look foreign policy affect American actions in Asia the middle east and latin America?

420 69 666


What was the traditional foreign policy of japan before imperialism?

Prior to its imperialist policy during WW II, Japan had a long history of isolationism.


What is the Foreign policy is the?

What is the current foreign policy WHERE? (in the US) The President is responsible for foreign policy.