0
Charles I of Britain, like his father, James VI, had a very poor relationship with Parliament. Charles dissolved Parliament three times between 1625-1629 and said he would rule alone. When troubles began in Scotland he angrily threatened to arrest several members of Parliament. Subsequently, civil war ensued.
What else can I help you with?
How has Afghanistan's conflict affected its health?
There is no proper answer to this question. This is because the health in Afghanistan before the conflict was awful already. The health has been made obviusly worse by the conflict, as the sanitation the people need is less than before.
Was strategic bombing worse than Nazi Death camps?
The total death count from the strategic bombing in ww2 was much lower, but the destruction was much more widespread. I would encourage you to read more about the Strategic bombing during World War II and make those decisions yourself. You can make arguments both ways on what worse really means.
How do you think Japan's entering the war made things worse for the allies?
During World War II, the entry of Japan into the conflict made things worse for the Allies in numerous ways. The additional losses of lives and materials, the need to defend, capture, or recapture additional territory, the threat to sources of important raw materials, and many other additional challenges all came with Japan's aggressive participation in the war on the side of the Axis.
Is America headed for another Great Depression?
in about 180 days we will be in the worse of the worse.. so yes we will be in a great depression..
Why was World War 1 considered worse than World War 2?
Honestly, by whom? There are some reasons that WW1 couldbe considered "worse", but you need to be specific about your measuring stick - that is, what do you mean by "worse"?
Why was parliament better than king Charles?
from a perspective of a Protestant back then, he had made churches more catholic and he was financially worse(ship money)
What effect do the narrators decisions have on the people of Borneo?
They are worse off than they were before.
What effect do the narrator's decisions have on the people of Borneo?
They are worse off than they were before.
Did American involvement make the Vietnam conflict worse?
If one wants to state that a bigger war is worse than a small war, then yes.
Trigger facts about the English Civil War?
There are many different reasons for the causes of the English civil war but first I will start with the religious disputes over archbishops Laud's reforms of the church. Reforms were introduced that made churches more decorated (like catholic churches) Charles I collected customs duties without parliaments permission, he married a French catholic who was unpopular with his people. The Bishops' Wars were fought between the Scots and English forces led by Charles I. These conflicts paved the way for the uprising of Parliament that began the English civil wars. Charles I was attempting to enforce Anglican reforms onto the Scottish church. However the Scots were opposed to this, and even wanted to destroy the control that bishops had over the church. To this end, Charles' reforms were rejected by the Scottish Assembly at Glasgow in 1638. Charles was furious that the Scots had rejected his proposals, and hastily formed an English force with which to march on Scotland in 1639. He did not have the funds for such a military expedition, nor confidence in his troops, so he was forced to leave Scotland without fighting a battle. The unrest continued in Scotland, and when Charles discovered that they had been plotting with the French he again decided to mount a military expedition. This time, Charles called Parliament in order to get funds (1640). The second cause was the financial quarrels between the king and parliament. When parliament formed, they immediately wanted to discuss grievances against the government, and were generally opposed to any military operation. This angered Charles and he dismissed parliament again, hence the name "Short Parliament" that it is commonly given. Charles went ahead with his military operation without Parliament's support, and was beaten by the Scots. The Scots, taking advantage of this, went on to seize Northumberland and Durham. Charles found himself in a desperate position, and was forced to call parliament again in November, 1640. This parliament is known as the "Long Parliament". The third cause was the demands made by parliament for greater share government. The tension between Charles and Parliament was still great, since none of the issues raised by the Short Parliament had been resolved. This tension was brought to a head on January 4th, 1642 when Charles attempted to arrest five members of parliament. This attempt failed, since they were spirited away before the king's troops arrived. Charles left London and both he and parliament began to stockpile military resources and recruit troops. Charles officially began the war by raising his standard at Nottingham in August, 1642. At this stage of the wars, parliament had no wish to kill the king. It was hoped that Charles could be reinstated as ruler, but with a more constructive attitude to parliament. Parliaments were supported by the richer South and East, including London. Parliament also held most of the ports, since the merchants that ran them saw more profit in a parliament-lead country. Parliament definitely had access to more resources than the king, and could collect taxes. Charles had to depend on donations from his supporters to fund his armies. The fourth cause was that Charles I ruled without parliament. Charles I dissolved parliament because of all the disputes and ruled without it for 11 years. King did not like the wealth, power or ideas of parliament. He began making the decisions about taxes without parliament. The fifth cause was that the ship money argument. Without parliament, Charles had to think up new pays of raising money, e.g. ship money which was paid in times of war by people living the coast, now had to pay by all people even though there was no war. The sixth cause was that the parliament was recalled and demanded reforms. King Charles I wanted money, so he reopened the parliament to get money but they demanded the reforms e.g. never to be shut down again. These are called the long - term cases. Some M.P.S demanded more reforms from the king in a new list called 'the grand remonstrance' other M.P.S stick up for the king because he has already greed to some reforms. A rebellion starts in Ireland where Catholics murdered 200,000 Protestants. The England wondered if Charles supported the Catholics. Charles I try to arrest five M.P.S while parliament is in session, but they had escaped before hand. This lost the king a lot of respect and showed he wanted to control parliament after all. Parliament and the king argued over who control the Army. Only six days after trying to arrest the five Members of Parliament, Charles left London to head for Oxford to raise an army to fight Parliament for control of England. A civil war could not be avoided. By 1642, relations between Parliament and Charles had become very bad. Charles had to do as Parliament wished as they had the ability to raise the money that Charles needed. However, as a firm believer in the "divine right of kings", such a relationship was unacceptable to Charles. These are called the short - term causes. From the beginning of his reign, King Charles quarrelled with parliament about power. King Charles dismissed parliament in 1629 and ruled without it for 11 years. In 1635, King Charles made everyone pay the ship money tax. The Scots rebelled against the new prayer book which the king and archbishop laud introduced in Scotland. In 1638, the Scots invaded England. King Charles asked parliament for money to raise an army. Parliament made King Charles agree to reforms in 1641. King Charles and archbishop laud made changes of the Church of England which were unpopular. The puritans were angry about the king's Catholic sympathies. These are shot - term causes and long - term causes, they are linked together between causes and how they lead to civil war. I think there were almost as many reasons for people to fight the civil war as there were people fighting. Briefly, however, the main reason for the war was the king Charles I and his various parliaments did not agree about anything - religion, how the country should be run, how England should behave towards other countries and so on. This was made worse by the fact that Charles I, believing that kings got their power from god and so could rule as they chose, made no attempt to keep his parliament happy. He spent eleven years ruling without parliament at all. When the long parliament, called in 1640, tried to make him change his ways and he refused, war broke out. (Some important things may not have set off the war, without the small triggers). Hope this Helps
Was England in the 1800s as bad as Charles Dickens portray in his novels?
For most it was far worse.
Does a plot complication help make the conflict worse?
Yes, a plot complication can often make the conflict worse by adding additional obstacles or challenges for the protagonist to overcome. This can increase tension and raise the stakes of the conflict, making the resolution more satisfying for the audience.
How has Afghanistan's conflict affected its health?
There is no proper answer to this question. This is because the health in Afghanistan before the conflict was awful already. The health has been made obviusly worse by the conflict, as the sanitation the people need is less than before.
Why do my parents always think the worse?
Because minors are immature and have poor impulse control so they make poor decisions.
Why did treatment of Cherokee get worse after the Court declared Georgia's Indian removal laws to be unconstitutional?
The federal government did not enforce the Court's decisions.
Why did the treatment of Cherokee get worse after the supreme court declared Georgia's Indian laws to be unconstitutional?
The federal government did not enforce the Court's decisions.
In the story Top of the Food Chain what effect do the narrator's decisions have on the people of Borneo?
The village was worse off than they had been before.
