Shakespeare did not use the word "chaos" in Julius Caesar, so either you found this sentence in a commentary on the play or in someone else's play of Julius Caesar. Chaos is a lack of order, a mixed up mess with no structure or functionality. By "lawful social order" the writer is describing a social structure governed by laws and rules. It is broken when someone breaks those rules. Presumably what the writer is trying to suggest is that by attempting to change the government by murdering Caesar, the conspirators broke the "lawful social order" and chaos ensued. Perhaps he or she would point to the behaviour of the mob in killing the poet Cinna. But in fact, chaos does not result from the assassination either in the play or in history. In the play, Antony, joined by Octavian, step immediately into Caesar's shoes and become the new dictators. The assassins succeed in changing one dictator for another. Indeed, history shows us that assassination of the dictator is a part of the "lawful social order" in a Dictatorship; it's the way you change the government when there are no elections. It was used over and over in the centuries of Roman Empire which followed.
No, it isn't lawful to fight on the Sabbath, let alone work then.
Matt:22:17-22: Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not? 18: But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites? 19: Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny. 20: And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? 21: They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's. 22: When they had heard these words, they marvelled, and left him, and went their way.
lawful monarchs should be restored.
Written permission from lawful authority.
Read article 91 of the UCMJ manual
The officer issued a lawful order. It was not lawful to take control of the vehicle. It would have to be a lawful taking for it to hold up in court.
The opposite prefix to "lawful" is "un-," so the opposite of "lawful" would be "unlawful."
I don't think there was any such person in ancient Rome. Julius is a gens or clan designation. Someone with the name Julius would be from the Julian clan or Julii. Now each clan had certain surnames that they used. Gracchus is not a Julian surname it is a Sempronius clan surname. Therefore there could not have been an ancient Roman with that lawful name, as a man cannot belong to two clans or gens. Perhaps the name Julius Gracchus is a modern pseudo-Latin concoction.
this seems to be profiling in it's most basic form.cops can get information on "anyone" just by driving behind them.This should not be lawful! any race,or gender can be targeted by a biased cop.
It must be lawful. If it is not, you will be arrested immediately.
No, they were not trespssing in order to commit a crime. They had a lawful reason to be on your property. sorri
He was a lawful permanent resident.
"Lawful husband" means a husband recognized by law.
The Lawful Cheater was created on 1925-07-17.
No, it isn't lawful to fight on the Sabbath, let alone work then.
I don't think there was any such person in ancient Rome. Julius is a gens or clan designation. Someone with the name Julius would be from the Julian clan or Julii. Now each clan had certain surnames that they used. Gracchus is not a Julian surname it is a Sempronius clan surname. Therefore there could not have been an ancient Roman with that lawful name, as a man cannot belong to two clans or gens. Perhaps the name Julius Gracchus is a modern pseudo-Latin concoction.
Lawful is the adjective of law. "Lawful authority" It could also be Lawless. "Lawless authority"