he means well
Thoreau's arguments can be seen as those of a patriot, as he passionately advocates for individual conscience and moral integrity in the face of unjust laws, particularly in his essay "Civil Disobedience." His call for nonviolent resistance to government actions, such as slavery and the Mexican-American War, reflects a deep commitment to the principles of justice and freedom that underpin American democracy. While some may view his defiance as traitorous, Thoreau's intent was to inspire a more just society, making his stance ultimately more patriotic than treasonous.
In "Civil Disobedience," Thoreau's main claim is that individuals have a moral obligation to resist unjust government actions and laws. He argues that true justice comes from following one's conscience rather than blindly adhering to authority. Thoreau advocates for nonviolent resistance as a means to effect change and uphold personal integrity in the face of injustice. Ultimately, he emphasizes the importance of individual action in promoting social and political reform.
The Chief Justice.
The Chief US Supreme Justice at the time of the Dred Scott decision was Justice Taney. He wrote the majority decision that proclaimed that Blacks in the USA could never be citizens. It was a 7 to 2 decision.
would understand that law and order exist for the purpose of establishing justice
Thoreau believed that the majority rule can lead to the oppression of minority viewpoints and rights. He argued that true justice requires respect for individual conscience and rights, which may be sacrificed in a system where the majority dictates policies and decisions. Thoreau's concern was that such a system can easily lead to tyranny and injustice.
He thinks it is not based on justice.
Thoreau believed that the government has an ethical responsibility to protect the rights and interests of minority populations, even if it means going against the majority. He argued that it is the duty of the government to ensure justice and fair treatment for all its citizens, regardless of their numbers.
For a government to be just, Thoreau believed it needed to be based on the consent of the governed, uphold the principles of individual freedom and rights, and be willing to address and correct injustices. He emphasized the importance of citizens being actively engaged and holding their government accountable to ensure justice.
Thoreau believed that a citizen should expect the government to uphold justice, protect individual rights, and facilitate the common good. He argued that citizens have a moral obligation to resist unjust laws and government actions, advocating for civil disobedience when necessary. Ultimately, Thoreau expected the government to align with higher moral principles, rather than simply enforcing the status quo.
Henry David Thoreau wrote the essay "Civil Disobedience," which discusses the duty of individuals to resist unjust laws imposed by the government. Thoreau's work has inspired many movements advocating for civil rights and social justice.
In "Resistance to Civil Government," Henry David Thoreau criticizes the moral complicity of individuals in a government that perpetuates injustice, particularly regarding slavery and the Mexican-American War. He argues that citizens should prioritize their conscience over allegiance to the state, advocating for civil disobedience as a means to resist unjust laws. Thoreau emphasizes the importance of individual responsibility and ethical action in the face of systemic wrongdoing. Ultimately, he calls for a more profound commitment to justice and personal integrity.
If the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is part of the majority in a decision, they have the privilege of writing the majority opinion or designating another justice to do so. This opinion articulates the Court's reasoning and establishes the legal precedent for future cases. If the Chief Justice is in the minority, the most senior justice in the majority typically writes the opinion.
Thoreau was critical of America's public attitude towards the Mexican-American War, as he believed it was driven by aggressive expansionism rather than principles of justice and morality. He famously protested the war and refused to pay his taxes in protest of the government's actions.
most junior justice on the Court. most senior associate justice in the majority. chief justice, as in other cases. most senior associate justice in the minority. solicitor general.
If the Chief Justice is part of the majority in a Supreme Court decision, they have the authority to assign the task of writing the court's opinion to themselves or to another justice in the majority. This opinion articulates the Court's reasoning and legal rationale behind the decision. If the Chief Justice is not in the majority, the most senior justice in the majority typically assigns the opinion writing. This process is crucial as the written opinion sets a precedent for future cases.
The Ministry of Justice.