Yes. But the suit would be for discrimination against the tenant who is handicapped, not for discrimination against the handicap. The justification for most suits for discrimination against people with handicaps is the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which is explained at http://www.jan.wvu.edu/links/adalinks.htm
No, he in fact was against Puritans.
Discrimination was like the trail of tears it was bad
Puritans
kerela
Anti-semitism is discrimination against Jews.
Discrimination in any form is discrimination. Individual discrimination is discrimination of one person against a group. Institutional discrimination would be a institution totally and wholly discriminating against a group or sect.
They were against it.
persecution
No, they were against it.
Campaign Against Racial Discrimination was created in 1964.
Religion doesn't automatically imply discrimination, though religion has been used as a reason for discrimination AND for fighting against discrimination. It all depends on the actual person, not all religious people are 'for discrimination', and not all non-religious people are against discrimination.
No. Discrimination is NEVER justified.
Go find out.
Yes. But the suit would be for discrimination against the tenant who is handicapped, not for discrimination against the handicap. The justification for most suits for discrimination against people with handicaps is the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which is explained at http://www.jan.wvu.edu/links/adalinks.htm
Group Against Racial Discrimination - Fiji - was created in 1990.
No, he in fact was against Puritans.