Atomic not Atomis!
The main issue in the debate over affirmative action revolves around the balance between promoting diversity and addressing historical inequalities versus ensuring equal treatment and opportunities for all individuals, regardless of race or background. Proponents argue that affirmative action helps rectify systemic discrimination and creates a more inclusive society, while opponents contend that it can lead to reverse discrimination and undermine meritocracy. This tension highlights broader societal questions about fairness, equity, and the role of government in addressing social injustices.
Argue that a new government was necessary to protect the rights of the people.
The money raised by Proposition B will unlikely go to improving the roads.
resources were being taken away from poverty programs.
Third speaker of affirmative:1. Speaks after second Negative.2. Concludes argument of Affirmative team.3. Rebuts arguements of second Negative and whole Negative team.4. Summarises whole argument of Affirmative team.Third speaker of negative:1. Speaks after third affirmative.2. Stresses main points of negative argument. (Cannot raise any new points)3. Rebuts arguements of third affirmative, and whole affirmative team.4. Summarises whole argument of Negative team.I hope this helps (-:
Third speaker of affirmative:1. Speaks after second Negative.2. Concludes argument of Affirmative team.3. Rebuts arguements of second Negative and whole Negative team.4. Summarises whole argument of Affirmative team.Third speaker of negative:1. Speaks after third affirmative.2. Stresses main points of negative argument. (Cannot raise any new points)3. Rebuts arguements of third affirmative, and whole affirmative team.4. Summarises whole argument of Negative team.I hope this helps
America succeeded to implement the affirmative action because it had great support from the citizens. The main aim was to help curb discrimination in America.
As it stands today in the US, affirmative action policies are not a main point of discussion. There are several reasons why. One is that the programs did not work very well. The other is that, aside, from recessions, discrimination in hiring practices is rare and against the law. The topic is controversial.
As far as I am aware, there is no logical, coherent argument against healthy eating.
Federalists wanted to urge the Constitution to be in action, but the Anti-Federalists didn't want the Constitution to be in commencement. They were against it.
The main argument against the South's desire to secede from the union is the boundary issue. There is a boundary issue on where the boundary should actually be.
cause they can and they felt like it
they didn't get to practice the Bill of Rights
they didn't get to practice the Bill of Rights
It had an unfair impact on poorer citizens.
Atomic not Atomis!