Racism and Discrimination exist EVERYWHERE. It is only the degree that changes.
Some people suggest racism is based on hate; others suggest the desire for superiority.
Some groups feel inferior, and discriminate against those it feels are superior (i.e. if we do not discriminate, we have no chance to compete).
In Japan, foreign athletes are restricted in most professional sports. In college running, for example, Japanese people 1) cannot run long distances as fast as many Kenyans, so they limit or prohibit foreigners from participation. Also, 2) Japanese fans do not want to see non-Japanese win (they say it is boring), so sponsors will not pay as much as when only Japanese are running.
Racism is everywhere. Some countries have strict laws against it, some have no laws.
The ignorant and those of low intellectual ability are unable to suppress their animal instinct to be suspicious of anyone who is different.
Another perspective:We fear that which we do not understand. The most common form of racism is seen when someone dresses or acts in a traditional way. For example: imagine that I come from a Scottish background, but my family has moved to the United States.If I go to an office job in my kilt, listen to bagpipe music on my CD player and heat my smelly haggis in the microwave at lunch, what will be the response?
One might say that everyone in the office should find that acceptable, but by acting in those ways I have demonstrated my desire to be perhaps a little TOO unique for a team environment.
I probably wouldn't be dismissed from my employment, but people wouldn't include me in the social groups, and my chances for advancement would be practically non-existent.
If I become something that people don't/can't understand, I alienate myself. I'm not a "Scottish-American", not if I want to be accepted. I'm an American, and I should want to assimilate into this culture and become a part of the group.
Yes, I should certainly maintain the pride in my heritage, and I probably won't be able to completely overcome the accent, but I should do what I can to become a part of the culture.
Try to find a copy of the speeches that were given at Ellis Island when it was opened as a visitors center back in the 90's. One of the speakers spent her entire time discussing how we should remove the "hyphen".
Another PerspectiveThe question of assimilation of minority customs to the majority's is much debated in the world today. In many places the attempts of the majority to "remove the hyphen" are viewed as extreme racism by the minority. A notable example is that of the Tamils in Sri Lanka, but one may also look at the non-Han minority in China, the Khmer minority in Vietnam, and North Africans in France. To these and other ethnic minorities your attitude to the Scottish-American would appear to be extremely racist.In some countries, such as Britain and Canada, an attempt is being made to institute multiculturalism. In this theory, you consciously decide to accept the Scotsman even though he wears a kilt, eats haggis and listens to bagpipe music. You can go further, and try haggis to see if it tastes good, listen to bagpipe music to see if you like it, and put your kids in Highland dance class. The Scotsman can enrich the lives of those around him.
There is of course a significant group in these countries who would prefer the American model, largely because immigrants themselves rarely buy into multiculturalism. They are having a difficult enough time adjusting to life in the new country without giving up the food, dress and sometimes language they are familiar with. So, to extend your example, you find groups of Scottish immigrants who hang around together and refuse to wear anything but kilts, eat anything but haggis, listen to anything but bagpipe music, and speak Gaelic whenever they can. People get annoyed by this: "I don't see why I should try haggis. You don't see any of them trying our food, do you?"
PerspectiveSee the discussion board for a little more about the concept.NOW was originally established to end discrimination against women and was founded on June 30, 1966, in Washington, D.C.
was established by a group of feminists who were dedicated to actively challenging sex discrimination in society. With 500,000 members and 550 chapters in all 50 states, NOWis the largest organization of feminist activists in the United States.
Matin Luther king jr
Historically, Black people in the United States and elsewhere have been subjected to various racial slurs, one of the most derogatory being the term "Negro." This term was widely used during the 19th and early 20th centuries but has since fallen out of favor due to its association with segregation and discrimination. Other offensive terms have included "colored" and various derogatory epithets that reflect the systemic racism and prejudice prevalent in society at different times. These terms are now largely recognized as offensive and are rejected in favor of more respectful language.
The phrase emphasizes the urgent need to overcome the challenges of racial segregation and injustice, likening the struggle to emerging from a dark, oppressive place into a brighter, more hopeful future. It calls for collective action and resilience in the pursuit of equality, urging individuals and communities to reject complacency and actively work towards a society where racial justice prevails. The imagery of moving from a "desolate valley" to a "sunlit path" symbolizes transformation and the possibility of achieving a more just and inclusive world.
i dont now u wierd guys i need the answer asweel. :)
Racial tension in the past was overt and institutionalized, with segregation and discrimination deeply entrenched in society. Today, while progress has been made in combating racism, there are still underlying systemic issues and instances of overt and subtle prejudice that contribute to racial tension. Social movements and dialogues around racial equality continue to play a significant role in addressing these issues.
No, or at least, it isn't supposed to be. Technically, racial discrimination of all kinds stopped after the civil war, but segregation continued onwards for quite a long time afterwards. I'm sure that people in the south even now are racist, but then again, so are people all over the world.
It's now pretty much accepted that in practice there is no difference.In US history, "segregation" was effectively used as a code word by states that wanted to discriminate but also wanted to be able to say they weren't doing so. They claimed that blacks were "separate but equal" ... despite facilities meant specifically for the use of blacks being nearly always inferior to those meant specifically for the use of whites.
Martin Luther King Jr. said this in his famous "I Have a Dream" speech during the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom on August 28, 1963. He was advocating for the end of racial segregation and discrimination in the United States.
never, it still happens now
The major law that prevents discrimination in the UK now is the 'United Kingdom Employment Equality Law'. This has superseded various other laws and clarified the circumstances where discrimination can be considered.
South Africa was once a racial oligarchy ruled by the white citizens and is now governed by a parliamentary system.
There is no discrimination in Saudi Aramco as of now. However, there may be isolated incidences of discrimination done secretly. As Saudi Aramco follows all of the laws of Saudi Arabia, Jews are forbidden from working at the company. This is a clear form of religious discrimination.
South Africa was once a racial oligarchy ruled by the white citizens and is now governed by a parliamentary system.
The practice of racial segregation has tainted USA's history somewhat. In 1930s segregation in schools and public places was strictly followed with black population living in impoverished conditions country wide. The situation since then has improved considerably and now segregation is a thing of past.
It dates back to the days of slavery, when masters ordered their slaves to work harder. It's now a derogatory term for being subservient, especially on racial grounds. It is often used without any racial overtones to mean rushing to respond to a situation. ex., After accidentally setting fire to the vacant field, the four your boys were steppin and fetchin to put out the fire.