Malcolm X used violence to gain civil rights. He was the leader of the Black Panther.
Answer: He felt that the movement was not progressing quickly enough and had relied too much on white 'permission'. He felt that African Americans should change their strategy to achieve their goals.
MLK chose to use nonviolent protesting which ended up working more. X used violence and made the owners hate them more and use force back.
No, certainly not. The consequences' of the Civil Rights Movement would have been different if they had been lead by King instead of Malcolm. The reason behind this is that both of them belonged to different cultures and religion. They both opened their eyes in two different environments that had a huge impact upon the establishment of their personalities. King was raised in an environment which was well-organized and cared for education whereas Malcolm was provided with a family that was unprivileged and went through several hardships. Malcolm believed that there was no equality and that blacks had to retaliate against the white's in order to gain rights. Whereas, King believed that all races are equal and that love was the only cure. The Civil Rights Movement would have been far more peaceful if it had been lead by King. Malcolm was a man who had deadly plans and was sure to use force against whites in any case. The difference would certainly have brought about a change in the American History as well as a huge impact upon the Civil Rights Movement. -Regards, Hope it helps.
You can use it to illustrate alot of things.
Yes. That was one of several methods used by protestors for improved Civil Rights. Also, black Americans were not the only ones to participate in these protests.
Malcolm X protested for the civil rights of African-Americans in the United States in the 1960s. He is often accused of advocating violence because of his use of radical language. But Malcolm only advocated the use of violence as a form of self defense. He threatened the use of violence by his people as a deterrant to those who would use it on them.
The NICRA (Northern Ireland Civil Rights Association) used peaceful methods such as marches, sit-ins, and protests to advocate for civil rights and equality for the Catholic minority in Northern Ireland during the 1960s. They also engaged in nonviolent civil disobedience to challenge discriminatory practices and policies.
Malcolm X use NON - Violent! But some of his supporters did get violent.
Malcolm X became a successful leader through his powerful oratory skills, which inspired and mobilized African Americans in the fight for civil rights. He utilized grassroots organizing and emphasized self-determination, encouraging Black communities to take control of their own narratives and destinies. His commitment to education and critical thinking helped him articulate complex ideas about race, identity, and social justice, making him a compelling figure in the civil rights movement. Additionally, his ability to adapt his message over time, particularly after his pilgrimage to Mecca, broadened his appeal and influence.
Answer: He felt that the movement was not progressing quickly enough and had relied too much on white 'permission'. He felt that African Americans should change their strategy to achieve their goals.
Malcolm X insisted that Americans should fight for their rights and that violence was acceptable to that end. He refused to see the black communities culpability. Malcolm X called on people to use violence to demand more rights. His beliefs were really strong that blacks and whites should be equal. His method was tactical, very similar to Martin Luther Kings. Malcolm x started several Muslim groups around the country and preached his revolutionary attitudes towards white. -Dandy#porn
MLK chose to use nonviolent protesting which ended up working more. X used violence and made the owners hate them more and use force back.
the two methods used were the constitution and the bill of rights
The plebeians needed their own assembly and elected officials in order to use their civil rights and to have an input into the government.The plebeians needed their own assembly and elected officials in order to use their civil rights and to have an input into the government.The plebeians needed their own assembly and elected officials in order to use their civil rights and to have an input into the government.The plebeians needed their own assembly and elected officials in order to use their civil rights and to have an input into the government.The plebeians needed their own assembly and elected officials in order to use their civil rights and to have an input into the government.The plebeians needed their own assembly and elected officials in order to use their civil rights and to have an input into the government.The plebeians needed their own assembly and elected officials in order to use their civil rights and to have an input into the government.The plebeians needed their own assembly and elected officials in order to use their civil rights and to have an input into the government.The plebeians needed their own assembly and elected officials in order to use their civil rights and to have an input into the government.
No, certainly not. The consequences' of the Civil Rights Movement would have been different if they had been lead by King instead of Malcolm. The reason behind this is that both of them belonged to different cultures and religion. They both opened their eyes in two different environments that had a huge impact upon the establishment of their personalities. King was raised in an environment which was well-organized and cared for education whereas Malcolm was provided with a family that was unprivileged and went through several hardships. Malcolm believed that there was no equality and that blacks had to retaliate against the white's in order to gain rights. Whereas, King believed that all races are equal and that love was the only cure. The Civil Rights Movement would have been far more peaceful if it had been lead by King. Malcolm was a man who had deadly plans and was sure to use force against whites in any case. The difference would certainly have brought about a change in the American History as well as a huge impact upon the Civil Rights Movement. -Regards, Hope it helps.
You can use it to illustrate alot of things.
he thought it would be all right to use violence.