answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

What is the significance of the bust of Sulla in Roman history?

The bust of Sulla in Roman history is significant because it represents the power and influence of Lucius Cornelius Sulla, a Roman general and dictator. Sulla's rule marked a turning point in Roman politics, as he implemented significant reforms and established a precedent for military leaders seizing control of the government. His actions set the stage for the rise of Julius Caesar and the eventual fall of the Roman Republic.


What president set the precedent for two terms in the office?

George Washington set this precedent when he refused to run for a third term despite encouragement from many to do so.


What did the deaths of the gracchus brothers change roman politics?

The deaths of the Gracchus brothers, Tiberius and Gaius, marked a significant turning point in Roman politics by highlighting the deepening social and economic divides within the Republic. Their attempts at land reform and championing the rights of the plebeians provoked fierce opposition from the patrician class and ultimately led to their violent deaths. This escalated political violence and set a precedent for the use of mob tactics and political assassination, contributing to the decline of the Republic and paving the way for future populist leaders and civil strife, culminating in the eventual rise of imperial rule.


What is a negative fact about the Rome republic?

One of the many negative facts of the Roman republic was its clannishness. A few old patrician families virtually ruled the senate. They had their set ways in interpreting the laws and customs. Their stubborn, uncompromising attitude was one of the factors that brought down the republic.


What political events during the first century B.C. helped weaken the Roman Republic?

Key political events that weakened the Roman Republic during the first century B.C. included the rise of powerful generals like Julius Caesar, whose crossing of the Rubicon in 49 B.C. ignited a civil war. The conflict between the populares and optimates factions exacerbated tensions, as populist leaders sought reforms that threatened the traditional senatorial elite. Additionally, the Social War (91-88 B.C.) and subsequent power struggles led to increased militarization of politics, undermining republican institutions and paving the way for autocracy. These factors collectively eroded the Republic's stability and set the stage for its eventual transformation into the Roman Empire.

Related Questions

What precedent did the plebeians set for participation in a republic?

Jack millman


Rome set a precedent for treating its vanquished foes after forming the Roman Confederation by?

2


When did roman set up their republic?

509 B.c


Should you say set a precedence or precedent?

precedent


What is the significance of the bust of Sulla in Roman history?

The bust of Sulla in Roman history is significant because it represents the power and influence of Lucius Cornelius Sulla, a Roman general and dictator. Sulla's rule marked a turning point in Roman politics, as he implemented significant reforms and established a precedent for military leaders seizing control of the government. His actions set the stage for the rise of Julius Caesar and the eventual fall of the Roman Republic.


Italian who led nationalists that set up the Roman Republic?

Louis Kossuth


What precedent was set with the fundamental Orders of connecticticut?

The precedent for voluntary union of the colonies was set with the fundamental orders of Connecticut.


Has the precedent set by Marbury v. Madison been overturned?

No, the precedent set by Marbury v. Madison has not been overturned.


Where did the Romans set up a republic?

The date given for the start of the Roman republic is 509 BC.


What type of government did roman had before?

they were ruled by the etrscans kings for about a century. then they set up the republic.


Is court precedent mandatory or persuasive?

That depends on which court you're referring to. In the federal court system, the US Supreme Court sets binding (or mandatory) precedent for all lower courts; the US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts set binding precedent for all US District Courts within their jurisdiction, but only persuasive precedent elsewhere; the US District Courts do not set binding precedent at all, they only set persuasive precedent.


What precedent did Washington set at the beginning of his first term?

Washington set an important precedent at the end of his second term.In 1796,he decided not to run for a third term