Maintain a balance between free and slave states, so that neither group could control the Congress, especially the Senate. These acts could not forestall the conflicts between the slave states and the abolitionists in the North, which eventually resulted in the secession of Southern states (1861) and the US Civil War (1861-1865).
The Missouri Compromise was a temporary band aid on the problem of slavery. Many in the South wanted slavery and many in the North did not. It made more people unhappy.
Because California was in both the north and south.
The Missouri Compromise allowed Missouri to be admitted in the Union as a slave state.The Missouri Compromise allowed Missouri to be admitted into the Union as a slave state.
Senator Stephen A. Douglas put forth the argument that if the Missouri Compromise of 1850 really was a compromise, it had to put forward a consistent principle. If it did not then it was not a compromise, but instead a modus vivendi arrangement. The main problem of this characterization is that Douglas was asking a rhetorical question. Douglas was the one to know inasmuch as he helped put it together.
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 allowed Maine to be admitted to the Union as a slave state. This was to counter balance having Missouri enter the Union as a slave state. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 allowed Maine to enter the US as a free state and allow Missouri to enter as a slave state.
missori became slave state, and manie became free state and gave a solution to slavery
Basically the Missouri Compromise of 1850 was a fair compromise. One problem for Northern abolitionists was that the Compromise ushered in the Fugitive Slave Act. They were outraged that the new compromise included this law.
It violated the Missouri Compromise.
The Missouri Compromise was a temporary band aid on the problem of slavery. Many in the South wanted slavery and many in the North did not. It made more people unhappy.
California was in both the north and south.
im pretty sure LAW is #1 problem.
Wht two things did the missiori compromise solve
Because California was in both the north and south.
Adding Missouri as a state was a potential problem because it raised contentious debates over the expansion of slavery in the United States. Admitted as a slave state, it would disrupt the balance between free and slave states in Congress, which heightened tensions between the North and South. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an attempt to resolve this issue by allowing Missouri to enter as a slave state while Maine entered as a free state, but it underscored the growing divide over the issue of slavery.
The Missouri Compromise allowed Missouri to be admitted in the Union as a slave state.The Missouri Compromise allowed Missouri to be admitted into the Union as a slave state.
Senator Stephen A. Douglas put forth the argument that if the Missouri Compromise of 1850 really was a compromise, it had to put forward a consistent principle. If it did not then it was not a compromise, but instead a modus vivendi arrangement. The main problem of this characterization is that Douglas was asking a rhetorical question. Douglas was the one to know inasmuch as he helped put it together.
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 allowed Maine to be admitted to the Union as a slave state. This was to counter balance having Missouri enter the Union as a slave state. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 allowed Maine to enter the US as a free state and allow Missouri to enter as a slave state.