0
The Holocaust has had one great impact on theology. It has showed us the destructive effects of thanking God. The Jews (and Christians and Muslims) often put God into the events of their lives. If a man decides to become a teacher, believers of those three religions say that God's plan for him was to be a teacher, and that he found his vocation. If their crops succeed, they say that God has blessed them with their crops. However, when we attribute our worldly successes to God's love for us (or to a reward for our good deeds, or to some other divine intervention), then when we fail in life, we are met with a question. Why is God no longer intervening to help us? Some say that is is because God is teaching us, that is, punishing us for something wrong we have done. Some say that it is because God is testing us (testing our faith). Some say that God is making our happiness (when it will come) more meaningful by having it be preceded by suffering. Some say that God is showing us (in a way that we did not expect) what our vocation is. Some even say that God has forgotten us, or that God is evil (which is absurd). But the Holocaust denied the possibility of the first four ideas. The Jews had done nothing wrong to deserve the Holocaust (and if they had, God would have punished them in such a way long before then). And it was quite hard for Holocaust victims to believe that God was testing their faith. Did God value faith so much that he would put people through the Holocaust just to test it? And why did he pick that specific time to test the Jews' faith so cruelly? And after a few months, why would God not accept that the Jews had faith and liberate them? The third idea also could not be true; it was apparent to most Jews in the Holocaust that their experience in the Holocaust, even if they survived, was enough to prevent any future happiness ever (although not for Viktor Frankl, one Survivor). And if God had created the Holocaust to make future happiness more meaningful, why did he do this so severly only once in the history of the world and only to the Jews living in Europe? And finally, the Holocaust experience could hardly serve to show Jews their vocation; there is no vocation to be had in a slave camp full of death. Because the Jews had been so used to attributing worldly happenings to God (e g they would thank God for the food they received), and becaue it is absurd to think that God is cruel, most Jews of the Holocaust concluded that there was no God. And their conclusion evidenced the real danger of attributing wordly happenings to God, that is of thanking God: if we thank God for success, then how do we explain failure but by Atheism? But the Holocaust victims' conclusion that there is no God is not entirely logical. We are certain now that there is no God who in any way affects the happenings of the world, but there could still be a God who does not "touch" the world at all. This makes sense. Christians, Jews, and Muslims all believe in free will (except Calvinists). So couldn't the events of the world be the result of people's choices? The Holocaust, then, occured because the collective decisions of people caused it to happen. And if there is no free will, we can attribute the Holocaust to the laws of physics, psychology, etc., which (as fatalists say) have caused every event in the universe, rather than to decisions on the part of God. In short, the Holocaust has showed us that God does not in any way affect the happenings of the world and it is dangerous to believe that he does.
What else can I help you with?
How are the human rights act and the Holocaust related?
after the Holocaust it was realised that crimes of this nature had no actual laws defining them.
How is the holocaust and the trail of tears alike?
They were not that different at all, in overall outcome and events. The "Holocaust" (extermination of Jews and Pol's (persons from Poland)) killed more people and that is about all of the differences. ______ The trail of tears was one part in the government's actions against the aboriginal population, where as the Holocaust is the collective name for all the actions.
What are the implications of questions that can't be answered in the field of philosophy?
Questions that cannot be answered in the field of philosophy can lead to uncertainty, skepticism, and ongoing debate. This can challenge our understanding of knowledge, truth, and existence, raising important questions about the limits of human understanding and the nature of reality.
Why was genoicde contiued since the Holocaust?
It is a part of human nature, much like the other more reprehensible traits, like stealing and so on, it will never be stopped. Even if it were stamped out physically, it would then just continue economically.
How did the German feels about the Holocaust?
It depends. A lot of them agreed with Hitler because it is within our nature to blame someone-the Germans blamed the Jews for economic problems. However a few thought it was unfair to blame a religious group for the collapse of the world economy.
What are fat questions?
"Fat questions" usually refers to questions that are broad, open-ended, or complex in nature, often asking for detailed explanations or opinions. These types of questions require more thought and elaboration in response.
Is pain response sympathetic or parasympathetic in nature?
The pain response is primarily sympathetic in nature.
How are the human rights act and the Holocaust related?
after the Holocaust it was realised that crimes of this nature had no actual laws defining them.
Does a Response questions always have only one correct answer.?
Response questions do not always have only one correct answer; they can allow for multiple valid responses depending on the context and the criteria used for evaluation. For example, open-ended questions may invite various interpretations or perspectives. However, some response questions, particularly those in standardized tests, may have a single correct answer based on specific guidelines or facts. Ultimately, the nature of the question determines whether there is one or multiple correct responses.
An effective Emergency Operations Plan will be?
Comprehensive in nature, including complete response procedures for everyone with a role in the response.
What are the fundamental questions philosophers ask about the nature of existence?
Philosophers ask fundamental questions about existence, such as: What does it mean to exist? What is the nature of reality? Do we have free will? Is there a purpose to life? These questions explore the essence of existence and our place in the universe.
What is an example of a stimulus and a response in nature?
An example of an response to hunger is hunting for food.Touching a hot stove causes you to remove your hand.
Are science questions limited?
No. Because the nature has no limit
Is nature an art and art is a nature?
Yes to both questions. As a Christian, I firmly believe nature is God's art as are people. Art is also a nature. I'm a cultural artist. I play piano and take dance. Art is what I do. So, the answer is yes to both questions.
How did pearl first respond to mr wilson's question about catechism?
Pearl playfully teased Mr. Wilson by saying that she has not committed enough sins to be able to answer all his questions about catechism. She showed her mischievous and witty nature in her response.
How is the response of nature to the Exodus presented?
What you meant to ask seems to be "How is the response of nature to the miracles of the Exodus presented."The Torah informs us that nature is completely subservient to God. He created the universe with its "immutable" natural laws; and He overrides these laws when He sees fit.See also:More about the Exodus
How do philosophical questions differ from questions of a scientific or factual nature?
Science is focused on "how does this work". Philosophy is more about "but what if" and "why does this".
