Factory owners typically apprenticed children from impoverished backgrounds, as these families often relied on the additional income. Many of these children came from rural areas and were sent to urban factories for work, where they could earn a small wage to support their families. The apprenticeships often involved long hours in hazardous conditions, with little regard for their well-being or education. As a result, these children faced significant hardships while contributing to the industrial workforce.
Factory owners often recruited children through a variety of means, including advertisements in local newspapers, word-of-mouth in communities, and by leveraging the economic desperation of families. Many parents, facing poverty, were willing to send their children to work in factories for meager wages, believing it was necessary for the family's survival. Additionally, some factory owners established relationships with local schools or orphanages, seeking to employ children who were not in formal education. This exploitation was fueled by a lack of labor laws protecting children at the time.
workers who were "Reds" or communists
factory owners
Until child labor laws were created, child labor was cheap labor and working in very bad conditions was the norm. Factory owners got cheap labor, which increased their profits considerably.
Factory owners were in fact "industrialization". Because the industrial base of the North was a significant one, it allowed factory owners to buy equipment from other factories to replace worn parts and add to their factory's output.
Factory owners reacted with violence
Factory owners often recruited children through a variety of means, including advertisements in local newspapers, word-of-mouth in communities, and by leveraging the economic desperation of families. Many parents, facing poverty, were willing to send their children to work in factories for meager wages, believing it was necessary for the family's survival. Additionally, some factory owners established relationships with local schools or orphanages, seeking to employ children who were not in formal education. This exploitation was fueled by a lack of labor laws protecting children at the time.
Investment from factory owners is equity and it is shown in balance sheet of business.
Type your answer here... free factory workers were treated worse than slaves.
workers who were "Reds" or communists
factory owners
Until child labor laws were created, child labor was cheap labor and working in very bad conditions was the norm. Factory owners got cheap labor, which increased their profits considerably.
Factory owners were in fact "industrialization". Because the industrial base of the North was a significant one, it allowed factory owners to buy equipment from other factories to replace worn parts and add to their factory's output.
Public outrage flared after a jury acquitted the factory owners of manslaughter. Then, New York set up a task force to study factory-working conditions
Factory owners did not take wages, they took the profits of the factory.
During the strikes many Union workers were paid higher wages while the Factory owners got nothing in return
Many parents were unwilling to allow their children to work in these new textile factories. To overcome this labour shortage factory owners had to find other ways of obtaining workers. One solution to the problem was to buy children from orphanages and workhouses. The children became known as pauper apprentices. This involved the children signing contracts that virtually made them the property of the factory owner.