answersLogoWhite

0

One argument that supported the Mexican-American War was the belief in Manifest Destiny, the idea that it was the United States' divine right and duty to expand its territory across North America. Proponents argued that acquiring land from Mexico would not only fulfill this destiny but also promote economic growth and spread democracy and civilization. Additionally, supporters claimed that the annexation of Texas and other territories would help secure the southern border and enhance national security.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

2mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Who in the US government supported the Korean War?

The US Government supported the Korean War.


Who supported the war on terror?

Probaly the same idiots who supported Bush and the war on drugs.


What was the US's argument for the war in Vietnam?

Cold war.


What groups supported the patriot war effort?

Spain and France supported the patriot's war effort.


At the time of the Revolutionary War about how many of the colonists supported the British crown?

one third


Whom did Russia supported in Kosovo war?

Russia supported Yugoslavia during the the Kosovo War.


Who one the battle of Trenton?

The patriots (American soldiers who supported the war) won the Battle of Trenton.


Which goddesses supported the Greeks in the Trojan War?

Athena was the most prominent goddess who supported the Greeks in the Trojan War.


Who supported the war in France during World War 2?

The Germany supported the war becase they were both in an allience with them and now that's who suporrted the France.Answerbecause they did


What industry supported the efforts of the Office of War Information OWI?

what industry supported the efforts of the office of war information (OWI)


Who supported the british in the French and Indian War?

the colonists supported the british


Suppose you have read two different books on World War 2 and each book has different arguments about how the war started. Which of the following best describes the stronger historical argument?

The stronger historical argument would typically be the one that is supported by a more comprehensive analysis of primary sources, considers a wider range of perspectives, and effectively addresses counterarguments. It should also integrate established historical facts while providing a coherent narrative that explains the complex interplay of political, economic, and social factors leading to the war's outbreak. Ultimately, the strength of the argument hinges on its evidential support and analytical depth rather than simply differing viewpoints.