answersLogoWhite

0

The freedoms the anti federalist were afraid the government would take away are listed in then Bill of Rights, largely in the 1st Amendment which says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

Why did anti-federalists believe that the constitution was a threat to liberty?

anti federalist believed it was a threat because it infringed on there freedoms. this is the reason the federalist papers were written and the Bill of Rights was created, to ensure people that their freedoms would be upheld by the constitution. and not taken away by the constitution


What did the federalist vs anti-federalist debate create?

The Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist debate created a foundational dialogue about the balance of power between the federal government and the states. Federalists advocated for a strong central government to ensure stability and unity, while Anti-Federalists feared that such power would threaten individual liberties and state sovereignty. This debate ultimately led to the inclusion of the Bill of Rights in the Constitution, addressing Anti-Federalist concerns and establishing protections for individual freedoms. It also laid the groundwork for ongoing discussions about federalism and governance in the United States.


Who were the anti-federalist and what where their differences between the federalist?

The Anti-Federalists were a group of individuals in the late 18th century who opposed the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, fearing that it would create a strong central government that could threaten individual liberties and states' rights. They favored a weaker national government and advocated for a Bill of Rights to protect citizens' freedoms. In contrast, the Federalists supported the Constitution, arguing that a strong federal government was necessary for maintaining order, unity, and effective governance. The Federalists believed that the checks and balances within the Constitution would safeguard against tyranny.


What did the federalist and anti federalist mainly debate about?

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists primarily debated the balance of power between the national and state governments following the drafting of the U.S. Constitution. Federalists supported a strong central government to maintain order and unity, arguing that it was necessary for effective governance. In contrast, Anti-Federalists feared that a powerful federal government would threaten individual liberties and state sovereignty, advocating instead for a Bill of Rights to protect citizens' freedoms. Their debates ultimately shaped the foundational principles of American government.


Which was a major point made in the Federalist Papers?

Strong government is necessary in foreign affairs. Three branches of government would prevent tyranny.

Related Questions

The anit-federalist were concerned that the federal government would use what?

the anti federalists were afraid that a federalist government would take the individual rights away from citizens and they thought that a central government was a step towards tyranny


Why did the anti federalist believe that the constitution was a threat to liberty?

anti federalist believed it was a threat because it infringed on there freedoms. this is the reason the federalist papers were written and the Bill of Rights was created, to ensure people that their freedoms would be upheld by the constitution. and not taken away by the constitution


Why did anti-federalists believe that the constitution was a threat to liberty?

anti federalist believed it was a threat because it infringed on there freedoms. this is the reason the federalist papers were written and the Bill of Rights was created, to ensure people that their freedoms would be upheld by the constitution. and not taken away by the constitution


Why would federalists be opposed to the patriot act?

the anti-federalist were scared that all there individual freedoms would be gone.


Why would anti-federalists be opposed to the us patriot act?

the anti-federalist were scared that all there individual freedoms would be gone.


Who believed that the new national government would reduce the power of the states taking the country back to a Parliamentary form of government?

Anti-Federalist


Why the federalist think the Individual States should have stronger governments than the central government?

Actually, the Anti-Federalists were afraid of a strong central government. They were afraid that their states rights would be over shadowed and they would be ruled over by a tyranny. They did not want a strong central government making their laws and infringing on their rights. The states believed that oy they could deteine what was best for themselves.


The Anti-Federalist would limit the Federal government strictly to?

The Anti-Federalist wanted to limit the Federal government strictly to what the powers the Constitution delegated to it.


What did the federalist vs anti-federalist debate create?

The Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist debate created a foundational dialogue about the balance of power between the federal government and the states. Federalists advocated for a strong central government to ensure stability and unity, while Anti-Federalists feared that such power would threaten individual liberties and state sovereignty. This debate ultimately led to the inclusion of the Bill of Rights in the Constitution, addressing Anti-Federalist concerns and establishing protections for individual freedoms. It also laid the groundwork for ongoing discussions about federalism and governance in the United States.


Why do the anti-federalist want a weak federal government?

The main reason the anti-federalists were against a strong central government was because they were afraid that their natural rights would not be protected. America had just finished fighting a war with England over these rights, and there was nothing in the Constitution to guarantee that the government would not take them away, that is why the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution.


Two arguments in favor of creating a strong central government?

two arguments were that they fought wrong. pour governmental skills. and some believed that the central government would not work..!that's two augment that went on before making the central government..! This is something I learned in 7th grade Social Studies not to long ago....if they had a stronger government then it would be able to tax. People were afraid that if that happened it would be lk Great Britai all over again.


Define anti federalist?

An Anti-Federalist is someone who opposed the ratification of the United States Constitution during the late 1700s. They believed that the Constitution would create an even more powerful federal government that would threaten the rights and liberties of the people. Anti-Federalists wanted to keep the government decentralized and argued that a strong federal government would lead to tyranny and the loss of state-level autonomy. They also feared that the Constitution would lead to an imbalance of power between the states and the federal government. Their primary arguments against the Constitution were that it lacked a Bill of Rights to protect citizens from the government, and that it created a federal government with too much power. They argued that the government should be limited to specific and enumerated powers and that the states should retain their sovereignty. Anti-Federalists were also worried about the judicial branch, as they feared that it would be too powerful and could be used to oppress citizens.