Sharecroppers in 1920 were primarily African American farmers, particularly in the Southern United States, who worked land owned by white landowners. After the Civil War and during Reconstruction, many freed slaves became sharecroppers as a means of subsistence, entering into agreements where they would farm a portion of land in exchange for a share of the crop. This system often resulted in cycles of debt and poverty, as sharecroppers frequently faced unfair terms and exploitation. By 1920, the sharecropping system was deeply entrenched, contributing to economic struggles and social inequities in the region.
They were no longer enslaved but many became sharecroppers.
No, all sharecroppers were not African American
they make wheat
Landowners often exploited sharecroppers through unfair contracts that favored the landowners, leaving sharecroppers in debt and with little profit. They manipulated the pricing of essential goods and services, which sharecroppers had to purchase from the landowners, effectively trapping them in a cycle of poverty. Additionally, the lack of legal protections and the illiteracy of many sharecroppers made it difficult for them to understand or contest the terms of their agreements. This power imbalance created an environment where cheating was both easy and common.
Sharecroppers
the farmers and sharecroppers
Sharecroppers could have planted:CottonRiceCorn
The Sharecroppers farmers in the south will like not prosper after the war.
They were no longer enslaved but many became sharecroppers.
No, all sharecroppers were not African American
An advantage of sharecropping over slavery was that sharecroppers had more independence and autonomy in their work. While still facing challenges, sharecroppers had the opportunity to negotiate terms and potentially earn a share of the profits from their labor.
So many freedmen and poor whites became sharecroppers.
FARMER
they make wheat
why did farmers become sharecroppers sharecropping offered a measure of independance
Sharecropping contracts typically favored the landowners, often resulting in unfair terms for the sharecroppers. Landowners controlled the land, tools, and supplies, ultimately keeping a significant portion of the crops produced by sharecroppers. Sharecroppers were often left with very little profit or autonomy.
Landowners often exploited sharecroppers by charging high interest rates on loans for supplies and equipment, resulting in perpetual debt for the sharecroppers. Additionally, landowners would often manipulate the accounting of crop yields and prices, leading to sharecroppers receiving lower profits than they deserved.