answersLogoWhite

0

Add your opinion:

  • Overall it would be total no victor, even without nuclear weapons. The united states Army, marines air force and navy would easily take Belfast and northern Ireland. Making it a simple BoO into Scotland. Once around London and Sheffield. It would get extremely bloody on both sides. If the United states got close to achieving victory in London however, the Vanguard subs stationed of England, assuming the bases have not been destroyed, would launch tactical nuclear warheads into London, causing extreme civilian and military deaths on both sides. It would bring up to America launching a ICBM from the silos in Colorado, North, South Dakota and Missouri. The Russians would most likely let UK and the US duke it out with war heads. Overall victor. None. 150 some million injured and dead in the US and about 2 1/2-15 million killed instantly in the United Kingdom. Overall winner: None. Forces decimated, population dead. UK protect and survive broadcasts may lower deaths, but not enough to be acceptable. This scenario is assuming that no other countries getting involved.
  • The United States would probably win, reasons well the United Kingdom's tanks guns and aircraft are mostly produced in the US the United states has 10,000 some troops already stationed in the UK the population difference is HUGE and the UK is a small island and the US is bigger than half the North American Continent also both in both world war France and the UK were losing until the United States rolled onto the beaches of Normandy, guns a blazin'. any one who disagrees can look up pictures of London in 1940 ;) it was a rubble town and shortly after the war ended the UK went bankrupt. (They spent too much money paying United States for weapons.
  • So many things to take in to account...Britain has remained uninvaded since 1066 and when Britain tucks up its Royal Navy,Air Force,Nuclear subs,sea defenses etc,nobody would be invading Britain in a hurry. America would have to attack from Aircraft Carriers and try to keep the Royal Navy and Airforce,nuclear subs from destroying their carriers., Britains nuclear subs are the most advanced in the world and would probably pick off Americas carriers from miles away. Much of Americas Militarys arms actually come from Britain as Britain is the worlds largest Military Arms exporters with its "BAE Systems" so they would be cut off.

    Britain and France joined Militarys last year so if it happened now France would be fighting alongside the British. The Queen of England is still Queen of 17 countries,Canada,Australia,New Zealand to name a few, their Militarys are "Royal" Militarys and swear their allgeiance to the Queen of England,so they couldn't sit back and see people attack their Queen as their Militarys have sworn their allgeinace to her for centuries. Both could also just nuke each other off the map easily. People can ignorantly say " USA has bigger military and funding so USA would win" is EXTREMELY IGNORANT as History has proven many times bigger does not equal better. Take England and look how tiny they are but still took over and ruled most of the world. Or Iraq and Afghanistan the Taliban don't even have 1% of the USA's Military funding or equipment but the Taliban are still taking on half the world.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?