Before we get to answering this question we need to remember that the U.S. of 1938 and today were very different from one another. In 1938 the U.S. was an industrial power recovering from a severe economic downturn ( the Great Depression). It's people and much of its government were not interested in getting involved in foreign wars. The people of the U.S. would have preferred that Europe did not fight but did not want to spill U.S. blood if they did. The U.S. due to interwar budget cuts was neither a major military power aside from its navy. The army and air corps were small and ill supplied until the rebuilding started in 1939-1940. Isolationism ran strong in the U.S. partly due to the results of World War I which left many people unhappy on both sides of the Atlantic. It took a swift kick in the U.S. backside (Pearl harbor) by Japan and declarations of war from Germany and Italy to break the U.S. from the isolationist stance irrevocably. European appeasement of Hitler was a strictly European matter to the U.S. public. The U.S. was not in a position, nor wanted to be in a position at the time to have a direct say in how the U.K. and France dealt with Hitler diplomatically.
the answer is appeasement.
No
They used a policy of appeasement. They met in Munich, Germany to sign the Munich Pact to allow Hitler to take the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia. This act made them look like fools when they learned Hitler had already sent troops into the Sudetenland before the Munich Conference and the signing of the pact.
Opponents of isolation argued that engaging with the world was crucial for national security, economic growth, and the promotion of democratic values. They believed that isolationism could lead to vulnerability, as it might allow aggressive powers to expand unchecked. Additionally, they contended that active participation in international affairs could foster cooperation and prevent conflicts. Ultimately, they saw involvement in global issues as essential for maintaining a stable and prosperous nation.
The people who live near the great wall of china should not take bricks and stones to build their houses. They wont allow to dig on the wall also.
the answer is appeasement.
Geographic isolation from other cultural influences.
The geographic isolation of the birds on separate islands. By: Yoshi
No
Migration isolation refers to the separation of populations due to geographical barriers or other factors that prevent individuals from interbreeding, leading to genetic divergence over time. Separation, on the other hand, can occur without isolation if populations are distanced but still maintain some gene flow. Both concepts are crucial in understanding speciation, as isolation typically enhances genetic differences, while separation may allow for some level of genetic exchange. In essence, while all migration isolation involves separation, not all separation results in migration isolation.
no
The Munich Conference, held in September 1938, was a meeting between Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and Italy, where the leaders agreed to allow Nazi Germany to annex the Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia in hopes of preventing a larger conflict. This approach was part of the policy of appeasement, which aimed to maintain peace by conceding to some of Adolf Hitler's demands. However, this strategy ultimately failed, as it emboldened Nazi Germany and contributed to the outbreak of World War II. The conference is often cited as a significant example of the dangers of appeasement in international relations.
yes they do
The Great Compromise allowed the Framers of the Constitution to create?
Great Britain did not allow the colonists to participate in government.
Appeasement was the policy Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and the French leader used to try to keep Hitler from invading their nations. They chose to "allow" Hitler to have the Sudetenland (amending the Treaty of Versailles). Well, that policy made them look like fools. Hitler was not appeased. He flat out told them he had already sent his troops into the Sudetenland and the Munich Pact was a joke to him. Appeasement is like dealing with a schoolyard bully who steals your lunch. You give him your lunch instead hoping he will leave you alone. The next day he not only steals your lunch he beats you up. You can't appease a bully. Just asked the millions of abused women and children.
Britain followed a policy of appeasement towards Hitler's Germany primarily to avoid another devastating conflict like World War I. British leaders believed that satisfying some of Hitler's territorial ambitions would maintain peace in Europe and allow Britain to rearm effectively. Additionally, there was a widespread sentiment among the British public and political leaders that the Treaty of Versailles had been too harsh on Germany, leading them to view appeasement as a means to rectify past injustices. Ultimately, this policy was based on a miscalculation of Hitler's ambitions and the belief that he could be negotiated with.