It was because back then only men were aloud to vote.
The verdict in the trial of Susan B. Anthony was decided by the judge, Ward Hunt, who instructed the jury to find her guilty of voting illegally. This was unusual because juries typically determine the verdict based on the evidence presented, but in this case, the judge effectively removed their discretion, reflecting the political tensions surrounding women's suffrage at the time. Anthony's trial became a pivotal moment in the fight for women's rights, highlighting the systemic barriers women faced in seeking equality.
That the jury can judge the law as well as the man. In other words, if they believe the defendent is guilty of breaking the law, but they think the law is wrong, they can find him "not guilty" anyway. This was done in the days when it was a crime to harbor a runaway slave. Some poor Quaker would be on trial for hiding an African American, and the jury would know for a fact he was guilty. But they'd vote "not guilty" anyway.
The price for a miniature set of U.S. coins, including a 1979 Susan B. Anthony dollar, can vary widely based on factors such as the quality of the coins, the seller, and whether the set is officially packaged. Generally, you might find such sets priced between $10 to $50. It's best to check online marketplaces or coin shops for specific listings to get an accurate price.
There is no such coin. All 1776-1976 Bicentennial dollars have a portrait of President Eisenhower! Huge numbers were struck so any circulated one that you find will only be worth face value to maybe $1.10. The first Anthony dollars were made in 1979. Again, enormous numbers were made and they're only worth $1 unless you have an uncirculated specimen in its Mint packaging.
Depending on their condition, they are worth abt. .20cents each. However, this is the catalogue price, there are so many around, it's unlikely you'll find anyone willing to pay that much.
The verdict in the trial of Susan B. Anthony was decided by the judge, Ward Hunt, who instructed the jury to find her guilty of voting illegally. This was unusual because juries typically determine the verdict based on the evidence presented, but in this case, the judge effectively removed their discretion, reflecting the political tensions surrounding women's suffrage at the time. Anthony's trial became a pivotal moment in the fight for women's rights, highlighting the systemic barriers women faced in seeking equality.
Juvenile judge find me guilty no evidence just one the victim Asia but the victim witness said he wasn't me
go on Google Home click Google Images and type Susan B. Anthony go on Google Home click Google Images and type Susan B. Anthony
The most common way I've heard it said: (in non-jury trials) "I find you guilty." (in jury trials) "You have been found guilty" or, "The jury finds you guilty."
Yes. A judge can direct the jury but cannot force them to a verdict. For example - the judge may say something like "..If you are satisfied the defendant acted maliciously, then you must find him guilty of murder. If not, then you must find him guilty of manslaughter..."
Unless you have proof you are not guilty the judge will still find you guilty. Why not just take responsibility for your actions if you are guilty.
Any link exist between this woman and plutonium or uranium.
Traveling threw the country as a activist to find justice for women's rights
That would be a Susan B. Anthony dollar and you can still get them at banks.
A judge or jury must reach the decision that the defendant is guilty beyond a REASONABLE doubt. Not beyond ALL doubt - just "reasonable" doubt.
tell the train driver stop the train until you find her key
Innocent means you are innocent of a crime.. That is you did not commit it. A court (jury/judge) will not find someone "innocent". They can't say that you did not commit a crime, they can only decide for "not guilty" if the evidence presented is enough that you are believed to have committed a crime (guilty) or not (not guilty).