0
What else can I help you with?
How many legions did Caesar have?
When Caesar ignored the senate's order to disband his army and crossed the river Rubicon to march on Rome, he had one legion, the Legio XIII Gemina. His soldiers werebattlehardened veterans for his wars inGaul He then gathered more of his veterans. When he went to Hispania to fight the forces of the opposition there with 6 legions, 3,000 cavalry and his personal bodyguard of 900 cavalrymen. He took three legions to fight Pompey inGreece. When he went to fight opposition armies in Tunisia he had 10 legions. At the final battle of this civil war at Munda in Spain he had 8 legions. In each of thebattlesof this war,Caesar'stroops were outnumbered.
Who led the Roman army?
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
What did Julius Caesar's leadership ability and military victories convince the senates of?
It convinced the senators that Caesar was a big threat to the senate. The senate ordered him to disband his armies after the end of the Gallic Wars in which Caesar conquered Gaul. These troops were very good, battle-hardened veterans who were very loyal to Caesar. His victories also gave him prestige and popularity with the people in Rome. The senate was afraid that Caesar would use his armies and popularity to seize power. Caesar refused to obey the order and marched on Rome with his soldiers from northern Italy. He started the civil war.
How did Augustus bring peace to Rome?
He took on the powers of a tribune of the plebsin the city and pro-magistrate outside the city, which gave him over-riding authority while still keeping the Senate to front as government. He took control of the frontier provinces, leaving the Senate in control of the remainder - the frontir ones had the legions, so he kept them out of the hands of over-ambitious senators who had been the originators of the revolutions of the previous century. He put the brakes on territorial expansion, establishing defendable frontiers and establishing diplomatic relations with neighbouring states.
What does Brutus say must be done in order for the plan to kill Caesar to succeed?
It was decided to kill Caesar while he was at the senate instead of other suggestions: to push him from a bridge, to run up and kill him or to wait for a coming gladiatorial show.
Why did the senate order Caesar to break up his army?
because his army kept getting bigger and that means the senate gets paid less
How many legions did Caesar have?
When Caesar ignored the senate's order to disband his army and crossed the river Rubicon to march on Rome, he had one legion, the Legio XIII Gemina. His soldiers werebattlehardened veterans for his wars inGaul He then gathered more of his veterans. When he went to Hispania to fight the forces of the opposition there with 6 legions, 3,000 cavalry and his personal bodyguard of 900 cavalrymen. He took three legions to fight Pompey inGreece. When he went to fight opposition armies in Tunisia he had 10 legions. At the final battle of this civil war at Munda in Spain he had 8 legions. In each of thebattlesof this war,Caesar'stroops were outnumbered.
Caesar defies the Senate's order to disband his armies?
In 49 b.c.
Who led the Roman army?
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
What year did Caesar defies the Senate's order to disband his armies?
In 49 B.C. following the conclusions of hostilities in Gaul...
How did Julius Caesar become dictator and what eventually happens to him?
Julius Caesar became dictator by order of the senate after he had won the civil war. His dictatorial powers were extended by the sycophantic senate along with extraordinary honors. It finally got to be too much for a group of senators and they assassinated him at a meeting of the senate in 44 BC.
How did cesear gain control in rome?
Julius Caesar gained power by ignoring an order by the senate to disband his veterans of his Gallic War, marching on Rome and winning what historians call Caesar's civil war against the forces of the senate led by Pompey the Great.
What did Julius Caesar's leadership ability and military victories convince the senates of?
It convinced the senators that Caesar was a big threat to the senate. The senate ordered him to disband his armies after the end of the Gallic Wars in which Caesar conquered Gaul. These troops were very good, battle-hardened veterans who were very loyal to Caesar. His victories also gave him prestige and popularity with the people in Rome. The senate was afraid that Caesar would use his armies and popularity to seize power. Caesar refused to obey the order and marched on Rome with his soldiers from northern Italy. He started the civil war.
What led directly to Julius Cesar taking power?
The wining of a civil war led directly to Julius Caesar taking power. Caesar began the war after the senate issued an order for him to disband his army and to return to Rome to face a trial for irregularities that happened during his term as consul. My friend franary gave a good answer. Let me however embelish it to give readers a more complete picture of this major point in the history of Rome. In 60 BC a coalition of 3 popular leaders were appointed by the Roman Senate to rule the Roman Republic's vast empire. It was named the 1st Triumvirate. The 3 members of this ruling body were Crassus, Pompey and Julius Caesar. This was pleasing to the Roman people and the aristocracy. Crassus was a popular, wealthy, and successful general who crushed the slave revolt led by Spartacus in 71 BC. Caesar was a general who was also an aristocrat and popular with the peoples' party called the Popular Party. He allied himself with Crassus. This Triumphirate politically maneuvered to block the power of the Senate. This was over a period of seven years. In 59BC Caesar was charged with commanding the Roman legions in Gaul. ( now known as France and Belgium). Caesar crushed the Gauls and invaded Britain. Gaul was added as a part of the empire, not just a conquered nation. The group of 3 was renewed but Crassus was killed in action in Syria in 53 BC. Pompey was left alone in Italy & was able to gain full control due to the absence of Caesar. In 49 BC Caesar & his legions crossed the river Rubican. His goal was to remove Pompey. Pompey & his Senate supporters & his loyal legions fled Rome. His army was defeated in Greece. Caesar now was left with no rivals and made himself the ruler of all of Rome's empire. Under Caesar, reforms were instituted. He granted Roman citizenship to Rome's allies in Spain & Gaul. He introduced a new & better calendar. In 44 BC Pompey's old friends, Brutus & Cassius led the Senate members to assassinate Caesar with the charge he was trying to make himself king.
How did Augustus bring peace to Rome?
He took on the powers of a tribune of the plebsin the city and pro-magistrate outside the city, which gave him over-riding authority while still keeping the Senate to front as government. He took control of the frontier provinces, leaving the Senate in control of the remainder - the frontir ones had the legions, so he kept them out of the hands of over-ambitious senators who had been the originators of the revolutions of the previous century. He put the brakes on territorial expansion, establishing defendable frontiers and establishing diplomatic relations with neighbouring states.
What does Brutus say must be done in order for the plan to kill Caesar to succeed?
It was decided to kill Caesar while he was at the senate instead of other suggestions: to push him from a bridge, to run up and kill him or to wait for a coming gladiatorial show.
Did Julius Caesar serve in the roman senate?
Yes, Julius Caesar served all the political offices in the proper order and was ultimately elected consul.Yes, Julius Caesar served all the political offices in the proper order and was ultimately elected consul.Yes, Julius Caesar served all the political offices in the proper order and was ultimately elected consul.Yes, Julius Caesar served all the political offices in the proper order and was ultimately elected consul.Yes, Julius Caesar served all the political offices in the proper order and was ultimately elected consul.Yes, Julius Caesar served all the political offices in the proper order and was ultimately elected consul.Yes, Julius Caesar served all the political offices in the proper order and was ultimately elected consul.Yes, Julius Caesar served all the political offices in the proper order and was ultimately elected consul.Yes, Julius Caesar served all the political offices in the proper order and was ultimately elected consul.
