0
poor country are getting poorer because of poverty for example Africa they have every thing they need but because the don't have the material to cut it and make it into a Finish product so they lose alot of money because they are selling raw product example diamond they don't cut and make it into a finish product.
What else can I help you with?
How has China's economy changed China?
The rich gets richer, while the poor gets poorer.
Why is it that relatively poor countries uses labor intensive technology while rich countries tend to use capital intensive technology?
Many poor countries, by definition, have little capital to invest in technology. At the same time, they often have a large pool of low-skill workers who are accustomed to low wages. In these conditions it makes sense to invest the resources they do have (cheap labor) instead of the resources they don't have (capital). Wealthier countries tend to invest capital in technology because it allows for fast production without the use of as much manual labor, which in wealthier countries costs more than in poorer countries. Richer countries also often have stagnant or negative population growth, meaning that the pool of low-skilled workers is limited. In these conditions it makes sense to invest in technology, not labor
What is the difference between a plebeian and patrician?
Plebeians are poorer citizens of the ancient republic of rome while Patricians are richer citizens of the ancient republic of rome. Plebeians also didn't have some rights such as not being able to hold office. When the Plebeians were finally fed up they pulled away but after some time the Patricians needed them so laws changed.
How is patricians and plebeians are different?
First of all both groups were Roman and had the sense of Roman patriotism. While initially the plebeians were the lower, poorer class, by the mid to late republic they were generally wealthy and were considered part of the aristocracy along with the patricians. Both classes held public office and the consulship.First of all both groups were Roman and had the sense of Roman patriotism. While initially the plebeians were the lower, poorer class, by the mid to late republic they were generally wealthy and were considered part of the aristocracy along with the patricians. Both classes held public office and the consulship.First of all both groups were Roman and had the sense of Roman patriotism. While initially the plebeians were the lower, poorer class, by the mid to late republic they were generally wealthy and were considered part of the aristocracy along with the patricians. Both classes held public office and the consulship.First of all both groups were Roman and had the sense of Roman patriotism. While initially the plebeians were the lower, poorer class, by the mid to late republic they were generally wealthy and were considered part of the aristocracy along with the patricians. Both classes held public office and the consulship.First of all both groups were Roman and had the sense of Roman patriotism. While initially the plebeians were the lower, poorer class, by the mid to late republic they were generally wealthy and were considered part of the aristocracy along with the patricians. Both classes held public office and the consulship.First of all both groups were Roman and had the sense of Roman patriotism. While initially the plebeians were the lower, poorer class, by the mid to late republic they were generally wealthy and were considered part of the aristocracy along with the patricians. Both classes held public office and the consulship.First of all both groups were Roman and had the sense of Roman patriotism. While initially the plebeians were the lower, poorer class, by the mid to late republic they were generally wealthy and were considered part of the aristocracy along with the patricians. Both classes held public office and the consulship.First of all both groups were Roman and had the sense of Roman patriotism. While initially the plebeians were the lower, poorer class, by the mid to late republic they were generally wealthy and were considered part of the aristocracy along with the patricians. Both classes held public office and the consulship.First of all both groups were Roman and had the sense of Roman patriotism. While initially the plebeians were the lower, poorer class, by the mid to late republic they were generally wealthy and were considered part of the aristocracy along with the patricians. Both classes held public office and the consulship.
What country is richer Kazakhstan or Uzbekistan?
Kazakhstan is a significantly wealthier country than Uzbekistan. The total GDP of Kazakhstan is $264.894 billion, while the total GDP of Uzbekistan is $123.577 billion.
Is Brazil getting poorer or richer?
The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer, while the middle class is staying the same, but internationally, Brazil is the 7th most economical powerful country in the world, but it will be fourth in a couple of years, so I guess you could say Brazil is getting richer everyday.
What are some of the variations between rich and poorer countries?
America has cell phones while other countries have never even heard of them. Some richer countries has almost all brand-name stores with a few second hand stores while poorer countries have almost completely second hand stores to buy food and such. Richer countries has grocery stores that have everything in it and they can order more, poorer countries have grocery stores that you buy everything you can because you don't know if it will be ordered again or when it will be ordered again.
How has China's economy changed China?
The rich gets richer, while the poor gets poorer.
How was wealth distributed in 1920s?
There was an uneven distribution. The rich were getting richer, while the poor were getting more poor.
Who are the characters in the richer the poorer fable?
The characters are two sisters: one poor, one rich. The rich one is poor in character, meaning she wasn't happy, and the poor sister was rich in character meaning she was happy and she lived life to its fullest.
Why do you think poorer countries tend to be in the south and richer countries tend to be in the north and list some possible reasons?
There does seem to be a pattern showing that the richer countries are in the north, and the poorer countries in the south. While there are some clear exceptions (Australia) it does seem that North America, Europe and Japan are far economically superior to South America, Africa and the Pacific. Perhaps it is because the people of the European region were among the first to develop superior technology and general civilisation. They also introduced these traits to other countries, particularly northern (U.S. and such). This is the only possible reason I can think of. If there are any additions to this, they would be greatly appreciated.
How does affluence militating against public examinations in Nigeria?
bcus d rich in nigeria believe so much on dis popular sayin "the rich gts richer while d poor gts poorer syndrome
What are the differences between modernazation and dependecy theories?
The modernization theory claims that global inequality is due to technological and cultural differences between nations, while the dependency theory claims inequality is due to historical exploitation of poor nations by rich ones.
Why poor countries are becoming poorer and rich countries are becoming richer?
Poor countries often lack access to resources, technology, education, and infrastructure needed for sustainable economic growth, while facing challenges such as corruption and political instability. On the other hand, rich countries often have established institutions, advanced technology, stable political systems, and access to global markets, allowing them to benefit from economies of scale and innovation. This creates a cycle where rich countries continue to accumulate wealth, while poor countries struggle to escape poverty due to systemic barriers.
What do critics say about market economies?
Critics commonly argue that in a market system the rich, who begin with a disproportionately large share of resources, tend to become richer while the poor, who begin with a disproportionately small share of resources, tend to become poorer.
Why has globalization led to a greater gap between rich and poor countries?
Globalization has often favored developed countries by providing them with greater access to markets, technology, and capital, enabling them to enhance their economic growth and productivity. In contrast, developing countries frequently struggle to compete, facing barriers such as inadequate infrastructure, political instability, and limited access to education and resources. This disparity can lead to a concentration of wealth and opportunities in richer nations while perpetuating poverty and inequality in poorer regions. As a result, the benefits of globalization are unevenly distributed, widening the gap between rich and poor countries.
What term is used to describe the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer?
There's no specific term. It's common to talk about 'a growing gap between rich and poor'.
