There was some slavery in the North. However, it was not the important part of life as in the South because of the different types of people who settled in each area. The North was founded by small time farmers and hard working Puritans who had rebelled against the English and the English way of life. Their church, family and community were important and closely knit.
The people who settled in the South wanted to set up income producing estates like the ones they came from in England. Because of the custom of primogeniture the eldest sons inherited the estates in England. The younger sons had to make their own way and many came to America and set up plantations. Since they didn't have enough cash on hand to purchase the land and set up income producing plantations with paid laborers they turned to unpaid slave labor. They used the backbreaking toil of slaves to enrich themselves and to reproduce the fine lifestyle they had enjoyed in England with slaves instead of paid servants.
There is also a substantial climate-related element which helped create the north-south split. The climate in the northern states gives a very short growing season. Most of the crops of the north are planted and harvested at very specific times. If slaves had been used, they would have had no work to do most of the year. But slaves have to be fed, housed, clothed, and guarded all year round. Slavery simply was not economical in the north. The south has longer growing seasons and slaves could be worked most of the year.
There was a religious divide as well. The Quakers were extremely important in Pennsylvania and Quaker thought had a large impact on that state and on the neighboring states of New York and Ohio. The Quakers were firmly opposed to slavery and helped abolish it throughout the northern states.
The names of three slave states are South Carolina, North Carolina, and GeorgiaPS: there's more than this and all the states in the south were where slaves worked and if they ran the would get badly injury and die.........FLORIDA TENNESSEEMISSISSIPPIARKANSASWEST VIRGINIAVIRGINIALOUISIANAKENTUCKY
in the south.
The states in rebellion - in other words, the Confederate states.
Your question incomplete. The answer is the Missouri Compromise. It did not actually decree that states to the South of the line would be slave-states. But slavery would be legal there.
Masion Dixion Line
south states are states that were ruled by slave masters.
There were numerous slave states in the United States. Some of the slave states were South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and Georgia.
There were numerous slave states in the United States. Some of the slave states were South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and Georgia.
in the south.
The names of three slave states are South Carolina, North Carolina, and GeorgiaPS: there's more than this and all the states in the south were where slaves worked and if they ran the would get badly injury and die.........FLORIDA TENNESSEEMISSISSIPPIARKANSASWEST VIRGINIAVIRGINIALOUISIANAKENTUCKY
Almost. South of the line, new states could be slave states, but did not have to be.
yes. The confederates were in the south and the south were the slave states
they made an agreement. there was acertian degrees to slave states and free states. the nourth is the free states and the south is the slave states.
The North were free states and the South were slave states.
The states in rebellion - in other words, the Confederate states.
Hi. Okay, to answer your question, the slave states in the south wereAlabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia.Hope that helped!
North wanted the new states to be free states south wanted the new states to be slave states