The ideal citizen of the Roman Republic was a man who put the state's interests before his own. The Roman concept of "gravitas" meant taking his public duties seriously. From this gravitas, he received "dignitas" which was his esteem, honor and reputation.
You have a double question here. If you mean what were the main characteristics of the Roman republic, they were the same as any other republic, that is, every citizen had a right to vote. If you mean who were the main characters of the Roman republic, there's a long list of them. Here are a few. Lucius Brutus, the Gracchi brothers, Marius and Sulla, Cicero, Julius Caesar, Octavian. There were many more in the long history of the republic, the above are just the most famous.
An adult male of Rome who owned enough property.
Anyone free-born could have this high status.Men, women (had a form, but weren't allowed to vote etc.), and the children of freemen/women were born automatically as a citizen.
The Roman Republic lasted 482 years.
Athenian democracy, Roman Republic, Roman Empire
The ideal roman citizen is the heart soal and backbone of the early roman republic. Male, family man, farmer, actively involved in government, when needed-willingly fights in military when needed
Cincinnatus was written about as an example of the ideal Roman citizen.Cincinnatus was written about as an example of the ideal Roman citizen.Cincinnatus was written about as an example of the ideal Roman citizen.Cincinnatus was written about as an example of the ideal Roman citizen.Cincinnatus was written about as an example of the ideal Roman citizen.Cincinnatus was written about as an example of the ideal Roman citizen.Cincinnatus was written about as an example of the ideal Roman citizen.Cincinnatus was written about as an example of the ideal Roman citizen.Cincinnatus was written about as an example of the ideal Roman citizen.
No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.
In the Republic a Roman citizen was anyone born into one of the 35 voting tribes. Citizenship was also granted to non-Romans in many instances, such as the Italians who gained citizenship after the social wars, and Julius Caesar granting citizenship to entire towns of non-Romans.
The republic, where each citizen had a vote to choose who would rule them.The republic, where each citizen had a vote to choose who would rule them.The republic, where each citizen had a vote to choose who would rule them.The republic, where each citizen had a vote to choose who would rule them.The republic, where each citizen had a vote to choose who would rule them.The republic, where each citizen had a vote to choose who would rule them.The republic, where each citizen had a vote to choose who would rule them.The republic, where each citizen had a vote to choose who would rule them.The republic, where each citizen had a vote to choose who would rule them.
The republic was run by a coalition of citizen assemblies and senate, the empire by a coalition of emperor and senate.
A doctor who has the right to vote for elected officials of the government
A Roman citizen was considered a Roman citizen.
In the Roman Republic, the citizens of Rome elected the Roman Consuls and thus controlled their own government. In the early Roman Empire, the forms of the Republic were often retained but not the reality of citizen control.
There was none. The Romans hated even the word king and would never tolerate one. However after the fall of the Roman republic Octavian/Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. We call him an emperor, not a king.
Rome's government changed with the times. In a weaker phase of Roman development, they had kings. The Roman people overthrew the kings and formed a republic when they realized their power. The republic at first was the ideal form of government, but overtime became corrupt and after a series of civil wars, the Roman people were ready for a principate that incorporated the outward appearance of the republic but was in fact ruled by a single person.
No. A poor Roman was a poor Roman, nothing more. The only way a poor Roman citizen could become a slave was to voluntarily sell himself into slavery. Back in the early days of the republic, some debtors were sold into slavery, but a law was passed against this practice.No. A poor Roman was a poor Roman, nothing more. The only way a poor Roman citizen could become a slave was to voluntarily sell himself into slavery. Back in the early days of the republic, some debtors were sold into slavery, but a law was passed against this practice.No. A poor Roman was a poor Roman, nothing more. The only way a poor Roman citizen could become a slave was to voluntarily sell himself into slavery. Back in the early days of the republic, some debtors were sold into slavery, but a law was passed against this practice.No. A poor Roman was a poor Roman, nothing more. The only way a poor Roman citizen could become a slave was to voluntarily sell himself into slavery. Back in the early days of the republic, some debtors were sold into slavery, but a law was passed against this practice.No. A poor Roman was a poor Roman, nothing more. The only way a poor Roman citizen could become a slave was to voluntarily sell himself into slavery. Back in the early days of the republic, some debtors were sold into slavery, but a law was passed against this practice.No. A poor Roman was a poor Roman, nothing more. The only way a poor Roman citizen could become a slave was to voluntarily sell himself into slavery. Back in the early days of the republic, some debtors were sold into slavery, but a law was passed against this practice.No. A poor Roman was a poor Roman, nothing more. The only way a poor Roman citizen could become a slave was to voluntarily sell himself into slavery. Back in the early days of the republic, some debtors were sold into slavery, but a law was passed against this practice.No. A poor Roman was a poor Roman, nothing more. The only way a poor Roman citizen could become a slave was to voluntarily sell himself into slavery. Back in the early days of the republic, some debtors were sold into slavery, but a law was passed against this practice.No. A poor Roman was a poor Roman, nothing more. The only way a poor Roman citizen could become a slave was to voluntarily sell himself into slavery. Back in the early days of the republic, some debtors were sold into slavery, but a law was passed against this practice.