0
John Calhoun of South Carolina (the 7th Vice President of the US) was among the Southerners who resisted Northern efforts to introduce abolitionist laws in Congress. He died in 1850, just as the anti-slavery movement was growing.
The Southerners wanted slavery to move to the western territories. They wanted their already booming economy to be spread into the new states. However, they reached conflict with the Northerners who were not in favor of slavery. The Kansas- Nebraska Act allowed the citizens to vote whether or not they were for slavery caused major problems. This increased tensions between the opposing states. Before Abraham Lincoln's election, the country struggled on the issue of secession. When he took office in 1861, things reached their breaking point and the first Southern states seceded.
What else can I help you with?
Who wanted to allow slavery in the western states?
Proponents of allowing slavery in the western states included Southern politicians and slaveholders who sought to expand slavery into new territories acquired from the Mexican-American War and other sources. They believed that allowing slavery would promote economic growth and ensure the political power of slaveholding states. Key figures such as Senator John C. Calhoun advocated for the protection of slaveholding interests in these regions, arguing that it was essential for their way of life and economic interests.
How did Kansas become a battleground over the slavery questions in the western territories?
Kansas became a battleground over the slavery question due to the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which allowed the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves whether to allow slavery through popular sovereignty. This led to significant migration of both pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers into Kansas, resulting in violent clashes known as "Bleeding Kansas." The conflict highlighted the deep national divisions over slavery and foreshadowed the larger national crisis that would culminate in the Civil War.
What caused the renewed debate over slavery in the west?
The renewed debate over slavery in the West was primarily fueled by the westward expansion of the United States and the question of whether new territories should allow slavery. The acquisition of lands through events like the Mexican-American War intensified these discussions, as both pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions sought to influence the status of slavery in these regions. This conflict was further exacerbated by the introduction of the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which allowed settlers to decide on the legality of slavery, leading to violent confrontations known as "Bleeding Kansas." Ultimately, these tensions contributed significantly to the political and social divisions that escalated into the Civil War.
What role did slavery play in westward expansions?
Slavery played a significant role in westward expansion in the United States. The expansion of slavery into new territories and states fueled sectional tensions between the North and South, eventually leading to the American Civil War. The issue of whether new states would allow or prohibit slavery was a major factor in determining the balance of power between the free and slave states, and ultimately the course of westward expansion.
What did Alfred T Mahan suggest the US or other western countries?
Alfred Thayer Mahan suggested that for the United States and other Western countries to become world powers, they needed to build strong navies and control key maritime chokepoints. He emphasized the importance of sea power in national strategy, arguing that naval dominance would allow countries to protect their trade routes, project military power, and expand their influence globally. Mahan's ideas significantly influenced naval policy and imperialistic ambitions in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
Why were the whigs and democrats forced to take a stand on slavery?
The Free-Soil Party wanted to allow slavery in the new territories.
Why were Whigs and Democrats forced to take a stand on slavery?
The Free-Soil Party wanted to allow slavery in the new territories.
In the period between 1820 and 1860 southerners wanted slavery extended to the western territories so that the south could?
maintain political power by ensuring that new states admitted to the Union would allow slavery, preserve the economic benefits of slavery for the southern plantation system, and protect the social hierarchy that relied on slavery for labor. This desire to expand slavery into western territories ultimately fueled tensions between the North and South, leading to the American Civil War.
Is where voters in a new territory decided if they wanted to ban or allow slavery?
The Dred Scott v. Sandford decision in 1857 established that territorial voters did not have the authority to ban or allow slavery; this decision held that Congress was the sole authority on the issue of slavery in the territories.
Wanted to allow slavery in the western territories.?
John Calhoun of South Carolina (the 7th Vice President of the US) was among the Southerners who resisted Northern efforts to introduce abolitionist laws in Congress. He died in 1850, just as the anti-slavery movement was growing. The Southerners wanted slavery to move to the western territories. They wanted their already booming economy to be spread into the new states. However, they reached conflict with the Northerners who were not in favor of slavery. The Kansas- Nebraska Act allowed the citizens to vote whether or not they were for slavery caused major problems. This increased tensions between the opposing states. Before Abraham Lincoln's election, the country struggled on the issue of secession. When he took office in 1861, things reached their breaking point and the first Southern states seceded.
Who was the people that the compromise of 1850 allowed people to decide whether they wanted slavery?
The Compromise of 1850 did not allow any choice in the matter. It reflected the increasing difficulty of creating new slave-states. It was the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 that allowed the people of those two territories to vote on the slavery question. The only time it was tried (in Kansas), it led to terrible bloodshed, and was not tried again. The result was that Kansas rejected slavery.
Did the confederacy allow people in certain areas to determine whether or not their territory would allow slavery?
The Confederacy was composed of states that wanted slavery. That was the main purpose of the split between the Union and the Confederacy. For that reason, it's implied that all the territories had slavery. Even if the Confederacy had allowed the people to determine whether there was slavery in their area or not, they would have chosen slavery because the vast majority of the people in the South were for slavery because it was their way of life.
What was the law that allowed voters to choose whether to allow slavery?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 allowed voters in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide whether to allow slavery through popular sovereignty. This overturned the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which prohibited slavery in territories north of a certain latitude.
What act allowed settlers in the territories to decide whether to allow slavery?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act
Which territories were able to choose by popular sovereignty whether or not to allow slavery?
New Mexico and Utah
He proposed the idea of popular sovereignty for the us territories?
The person that proposed the idea was Senator StephenA. Douglas. He wanted to abandon the MKissouri Compromise and let the settlers in each territory vote on whether to allow slavery.
How did the settling of new territories escalate conflict over slavery?
The new territories were made up of whites witch also wanted slaves to work on their plantations so they could make a profit so the slaves were being sold for more money and therefore meant that they were higher in value to people
