Queen Victoria's parents did not rule. Her father's three older brothers died without legitimate issue, so when her father passed away, she inherited the throne at age 18.
To keep the country under control.
yes, she did.
Queen Victoria had the wealth and resources to bathe every day. There is also evidence that she did bathe every day in her earlier years. However as she got older and gained weight getting into and out of a bath would have been painful and she bathed less.
The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.
The Queen's Throne is now available over at Yukea, and it can be yours for 75 Rox if you are lvl 10 or up. It's a rare item, so if you don't see it right away, then keep checking back.
No Roman emperor helped Cleopatra keep her throne. Cleopatra reigned before there were emperors. Julius Caesar established her on the throne after she had been ousted, but he was not an emperor.
Victoria was keep secrets from him
To get a son as heir to the throne
Well, honey, in Lewis Carroll's "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland," Alice does temporarily become a queen during a chess game in the sequel "Through the Looking-Glass." So, technically, yes, she does become a queen, but it's all part of the whimsical and nonsensical world of Wonderland. Keep up, darling!
I guess it was not the Queen Mary of Scot but Queen Mary of England that was considered as evil. Actually Queen Mary is referred to as Bloody Mary. There is a popular game among the children known as bloody Mary too. She was very lured by the power of throne. Infact, she was the one who imprisoned Elizabeth because she was sure that she would not bear the England becoming catholic again. Mary was the one who almost killed each and every protestant and she undid all her father HenryVIII and his brother, Edward VI's hard work. This is why probably Queen Mary of England is known as to be evil.
Hestia, the goddess of the hearth, in order to keep the balance and peace on Olympus gave up her throne to prevent battle because Dionysus wanted a throne on the council when he became a god.
No. While Queen Elizabeth did keep certain Catholic symbols, such as the crucifix, she was Protestant. Strong proof of this is the fact that she, according to Catholic law, was illegitemate, and thus would not have been able to take the throne. However, at least publically, she was mostly pragmatic in her relations with religion.