0
What else can I help you with?
What Greek philosopher propose that the speed at which an object falls is proportional to its massively Greek philosopher propose that the speed at which an object falls proportional to its mass?
Aristotle proposed that the speed at which an object falls is not proportional to its mass. He theorized that all objects fall at the same rate regardless of their mass. This was later experimentally confirmed by Galileo.
Galileo reasoned that the distance a freely falling object travels is proportional to the square of the time true or false?
false
Is acceleration directly proportional to mass or is it inversly proportional to mass?
Depends what u mean by that. If it is free falling it would obviously be accelerating at 9.8m/s^2. If there is an incline then it depends. I believe acceleration is directly proportional to velocity though.
How is the acceleration of falling bodies determine experimentally?
For example, you can time how long it takes for an object to reach the floor. You also need to measure how far it falls down. If you assume constant acceleration, there is only one possible acceleration for any possible set of measurements.
The distance that a free falling object falls is directly proportional to the square of the time it falls (before it hits the ground). If an object fell 91 ft in 2 seconds how far will it have fallen?
The answer is 91 ft, of course!
A proportional model of three dimensional object?
A proportional model of a three dimensional object is an scale model.
An apple acceterates as it fall from tree what law is that?
The law that describes the acceleration of an apple falling from a tree is Newton's Second Law of Motion. This law states that the acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the force applied to it and inversely proportional to its mass.
Is an object's density directly proportional to an object's volume?
An object's density is inversely proportional to the object's volume. As the volume increases the density decreases, and vice versa.
Is an object's density directly proportional to an object volume?
An object's density is inversely proportional to the object's volume. As the volume increases the density decreases, and vice versa.
Is an increase in kinetic energy directly proportional to the time it takes for an object to fall slash distance it falls?
The kinetic energy of a falling object is directly proportional to the distance it falls.But the distance is not directly proportional to the time in fall, so the KE is not directly proportionalto the time either.
What causes objects to accelerate?
Gravity causes falling objects to accelerate.
Is the acceleration of an object proportional to its weight?
No, acceleration is not directly proportional to weight. Weight is the force of gravity acting on an object, while acceleration depends on the net force acting on the object, which can be influenced by factors other than weight, such as friction or applied forces.
