That depends on the law of the country that person is in. In many country's the evidence is weighed by judges only, rather then letting any tom dick and harry make these life changing decisions
You're from Mrs. Beshiri's class, aren't you?
The right to a speedy and public trial, the right to an impartial jury of your peers, the right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusations against you, the right to be confronted by the witnesses against you, the right to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in your favor, the right to assistance of counsel for your defense.
No.
You have the right to a fair and speedy trial by a jury of your peers. The Sixth Amendment guarantees a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed. It does not guarantee a jury of one's peers.
The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states in part, "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law,..."
right to lawyer, speedy trial
it guarantees a person who has been accused of a crime the right to a layer even if he/she cant afford one.
• The right to a speedy trial! • The right to a public trial! • The right to notified of the nature and circumstances of the alleged crime! • The right to confront a witness who will testify against the accused! • The right to find a witness who will speak in favor of the accused! •The right to a lawyer! •J
the right to a speedy trial
-speedy and public trial by an impartial jury of the same state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed.-to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation.-to be confronted with the witnesses against him.-to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor-to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.(Sixth Amendment of the Constitution)
A person accused of a crime did not come from Roman Law of Nations.
In the Aztec legal system, a person accused of a crime had the right to a fair trial by presenting evidence and witnesses in their defense. They also had the opportunity to confess and seek atonement for their actions. Punishments were proportionate to the crime committed, and the accused had the right to appeal a decision to higher authorities.