If the law calls for a Veteran's Preference to be given (as it is with most government positions) - OR - the employer voluntarily follows such a practice in their own business, this is NOT a prohibited practice.
Yes, violating a veteran's hiring preference can be considered a prohibited personnel practice under the U.S. Office of Personnel Management guidelines. These practices include discriminatory actions against veterans in federal hiring processes, as veterans are afforded certain preferences to ensure they have fair access to job opportunities. Agencies are required to comply with these preferences, and failure to do so may lead to legal repercussions and corrective actions.
The preposition "from" typically follows the word "prohibited." For example: "Access to the restricted area is prohibited from all unauthorized personnel."
yes
supervisor counsels an employee for poor performance
assisting candidates in their application process
The prohibited personnel practice that addresses improper hiring practices where agency officials give preference to one prospect over another is known as "favoritism" or "nepotism." Specifically, it falls under 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(6), which prohibits any action that discriminates against individuals in hiring or promotion based on personal relationships rather than merit. This practice undermines fairness and equal opportunity in the federal hiring process.
If it is not prohibited by personnel rules or prohibited in their employment contract contract, it is assumed that they could. However, no one is REQUIRED to employ them either.
dod 4500.9-r
Supervisor stops an award after an employee reported discrepancies with TDY vouchers
Supervisor stops an award after an employee reported discrepancies with TDY vouchers
Supervisor stops an award after an employee reported discrepancies with TDY vouchers
Supervisor stops an award after an employee reported discrepancies with TDY vouchers