0
From what I understand of the american legal system - everyone has the right to be represented by an attorney - regardless of whether or not they can actually afford to hire one. It's the same here in the UK - there is a legal-aid system which pays lawyers to defend clients that cannot afford to hire their own legal professional.
What else can I help you with?
Is the defendant always required to provide testimony in the trial?
There is no blanket answer to this question. Whether the defendant testifies on their own behalf, is a legal strategy that the defense attorney will discuss with his client when the time comes.
Why does Gideon come to trial without a lawyer?
Because he couldnt afford an attorney to represent him in criminal court. The US Supreme Court ruled that criminal defendants will be provided with a defense attorney at government cost when the defendant cannot afford an attorney.
The defendant does not have the right to be told of the charges against himher?
Yes, in the US justice system the defendant always must be told what he or she is charged with.
Did Gideon v Wainwright deal with speedy trail issues?
No. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963) dealt with the right of criminal defendants to the Sixth Amendment protection of legal counsel, even if the defendant was indigent and couldn't afford an attorney.
How much the citizen process cost?
The US government process is free of charge, but if you hire an attorney to assist you, you will have to discuss their fee with them.
Do terrorist have the right for an attorney?
No, I do not believe that they are given the same rights of due process as that of a U.S. Citizen.
What is the US Supreme Court case Argersinger v Hamlin about?
In Argersinger v Hamlin, 407 US 25 (1972) the Court extended the right to court-appointed counsel for any defendant facing jail time, even if the defendant was being charged with a misdemeanor. In previous cases the defendant was only allowed appointed counsel if charged with a felony. This case made sure any defendant facing any loss of liberty had the right to appointed counsel.
A man accused of crime in court has a right to what?
The right to remain silent, which is proved through the US Supreme Court Case Miranda v. Arizona. He has the right to an attorney. He has the right to a jury of his peers.
Who is the person against the defendantin a trial?
It depends on where you are (like everything does), a Common Law system or a Civil Law system. In most parts of the United States (exceptions being possibly Puerto Rico, or New Orleans?) we use the Common Law system. In the Common Law system the defendant's case will be presented after the prosecutors case. The person that presents this case is the defendant's attorney. The defendant may obtain an attorney through several sources. They may hire their own, have one appointed if they qualify, or be able to obtain an attorney from a non-profit. If the defendant does not have an attorney, they are appearing pro se, or for one's own behalf. In that case the defendant will be the person presenting their own case. In the Civil Law systems the judge gathers evidence and information from each side and comes to a determination. In this system there is less emphasis on the presentation of the case that we generally see on TV in the US. It is generally best to consult with an attorney in the specific area to determine the best course of action.
The US Supreme Court says an accused is entitled to an appointed attorney?
Regardless of the seriousness of the offense if a defendant qualifies (usually by income level) for a Public Defender one will be appointed.
How does a felon get rights restored to obtain a passport and vote again I was convicted in Arizona in 95 but now live in Colorado?
Contact the local US Attorney. They will be able to assist you.
Are US Attorneys subordinate to the US Attorney General?
They are somehow under the US Attorney General. I just know that the US Attorney General is the head of the US Department of Justice.
