In court, no. However it cannot go without consideration that if employee was trained to use said equipment and caused damage, the employee may consider contributing to repairs.
The employer is always responsible to ensure employees receive training on every hazard in the workplace.
If an employer asks an employee if that employer can count on him or her, the answer should be yes. An employee must be reliable in order to benefit the employer.
The employee's criticism of the employer
A person is considered an employee when they work for an employer under a contract of service, where the employer has control over the work the individual performs, provides tools and equipment, and has the ability to terminate the relationship.
If the employee was responsible for the loss (this includes equipment under their care which went missing, unless otherwise shown to be another person's fault) then yes, it is entirely reasonable for them to withhold some pay to replace the equipment.
If the employee built the item under the direction of the employer, using the employer's plans or specifications, the employer will be responsible. If the employee did not follow the directions of the employer, particularly if it strayed from the standards of a normal build, then the employee could be held responsible.
There are various elements in determining employer-employee relationship. The main elements can be found in the recruitment and engagement of the employee by the employer.
An employer should not charge a 1099 employee for workman's comp. If you get a 1099 you are not in an employer, employee relationship You are an independent contractor.
The employer suspended the employee from the job.
An employer has a duty to inform the employee of an changes to the employment terms. If an employer is out on workers' compensation, and they are terminated, the employer has a duty to communicate that information to the employee and pay that employee any money they have due to them.
yeah he can be a employee or employer too.
the employee's honesty