Richard Henry Lee was initially skeptical about a strong central government. He believed in the importance of state sovereignty and was concerned that a powerful national government could lead to tyranny. Lee's opposition was evident during the debates surrounding the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, as he advocated for a decentralized government that preserved individual freedoms and states' rights. Ultimately, he supported the addition of the Bill of Rights to ensure protections for citizens against federal overreach.
No, the authors of the Federalist Papers, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay favored the Constitution, which provided for a strong central government. The Ant-Federalists, which included people like Thomas Jefferson and Patrick Henry, were opposed to the central government having too much control.
Patrik Henry Did support the Virginia plan ,however he was very afraid of a strong central government and thought that it would just develop into a monarchy.
Because they saw a more powerful central government as a threat to the rights of individuals and the power of state governments.
he opposed
Patrick Henry was simply opposed to having such strong central government, along with Benjamin Franklen. Thomas Paine was simply not at the Colonies durring that time, I believe he was in England.
Henry Richard Bender has written: 'The problem of consolation' -- subject(s): Philosophy and religion, Consolation, Providence and government of God, Christianity
Both men feared that it would establish a strong central government.
henry the viii
18th Century: Federalists (Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin) 19th Century: Whigs (Henry Clay, Daniel Webster)20th Century: Liberal Democrats (FDR, HST, JFK, LBJ)21st Century: Democratic Party
Henry Richard Mueller has written: 'The Whig Party in Pennsylvania' -- subject(s): Accessible book, Politics and government, Whig Party (Pa.)
Thomas Henry Thornton has written: 'General Sir Richard Meade and the foundatory states of central and southern India'
no