From what I found, the first violation of intent to go armed is a class C misdemeanor and the penalty for that is "not more than 30 days" and a fine of "not more than $500," however, you really should consult an attorney and not rely on information provided by unknown people on the internet.
If you're found to be in possession of a stolen firearm, expect to be taken into custody. If their investigation determines that you were knowingly in possession of a stolen firearm, then you'll be charged.
Each firearm can be a different charge. 10 firearms means 10 different counts.
Yes, it is illegal to possess a firearm while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and you can be charged with a crime for doing so.
Depends on what the felon was charged with.
You do not actually have to have the firearm in your hands or on your person. Just being close enought to it to have access to it, or have control over it is sufficient to prove the charge. In the law it is known as "CONCURRENT POSSESSION."
Yes, a convicted felon can potentially be charged with possession of a firearm if they take a picture of one, depending on the jurisdiction and the circumstances. Laws regarding possession can vary, and in some cases, simply having control over a firearm, including taking its picture, could be interpreted as possession. However, whether charges would be brought would depend on the specific facts of the case and local laws. It's advisable for individuals in such situations to consult legal counsel.
This depends on the exact charges brought, and the prior record of the person charged.
This depends on the exact charges brought, and the prior record of the person charged.
Get a lawyer. No one on the internet is going to be able to adequately answer your question. Possession of ecstasy is a felony, so if you had a gun at the time, you might be charged...
In oder to be in possession it has to be on you or in your sorroundings.
It depends on the state and the criminal background of the individual that gets charged. What state are you referring to?
Absolutely they can. It is not necessary to prove who owned the weapon or who was actually carrrying it. The fact is that they ALL had access to it. This is known in the law as "Concurrent Possession."