There aren't laws about such minute details.
However, if the two witnesses are for the prosecution, the defense could easily object to the situation and assert that this prohibits the defendant from receiving a fair trial, or use the situation to try to sway the jury to discount some of the testimony from these two witnesses.
Also, many jurisdictions have a rule that either party can opt to invoke, requiring that the witnesses not be permitted to discuss the facts of the case until after they have both testified.
No, witnesses do not need lawyers when testifying in court. Witnesses are typically called to provide their testimony and answer questions from the attorneys involved in the case. Witnesses may consult with a lawyer before testifying, but they do not have legal representation during their testimony.
Witnesses are obligated to reveal the truth to the court or legal authorities where they are testifying. It is important for witnesses to provide accurate and honest information to ensure justice and fairness in the legal process. Failure to disclose the truth may result in legal consequences.
Child witnesses in legal proceedings face challenges such as trauma from testifying, difficulty understanding complex legal processes, and potential influence from adults. Issues include credibility concerns, memory reliability, and the need for specialized support to ensure their well-being and accurate testimony.
Answer legal answerIt is witness.
An expert witness is someone who has special education, knowledge, training or experience in a specific field. They are often called as a witness in legal cases and may receive compensation for testifying.
In Pennsylvania, a codicil to a legal will requires the signatures of two witnesses. These witnesses must be present at the same time when the testator, the person making the will, signs the codicil. It's important that the witnesses are not beneficiaries of the will to avoid any potential conflicts of interest.
Yes, because the 6th amendment to the US Constitutions ensures that in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right to confrontation of the witnesses against him.
To change a person's will against that person's will is never legal. A person can be on his/her deathbed and still be conscious and competent to conduct his/her own affairs, and that's the key. There would have to be witnesses available who swore that the person signed the will of his own free will and without duress. That might be a problem if the pain medications are strong enough.
Generally speaking, a witness. They can be a witness for the defense or a witness for the prosecution in a criminal case. They can be a witness for the defense or a witness for the plaintiff in a civil case. If they are testifying in behalf of someone they would rather be testifying against, they are called a "hostile witness." NOTE: This question would be better to have been asked under the Legal or Law category so I will move it there.
The legal term for speaking the truth is "testifying truthfully" or "providing truthful testimony."
(in the US) Be faced by, and question, their accuser and the witnesses against them - to legal representtion - to be tried by a fair and impartial jury of their peers - not to expect any 'cruel and unusual' punishment. .
No, not legal.