answersLogoWhite

0

Generally, yes.

There are a lot of rule and exceptions to jeopardy, though. Consult your attorney for advice specific to your case.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Double jeopardy law what are the pros vs cons?

Pros; some pros in the double jeopardy rule are that they have more time to gather up more evidence to introduce to the Jury and the Judge. Cons; Some cons in the double jeopardy rule are that if they dont gather all of the evidence the person is tried and found not guilt because all the evidence was not collected.


What shows begins with J?

Jack Benny Show, Jackie Gleason Show and The Jay Leno Show are TV shows that begin with the letter J. Additional shows include Jeopardy, The Jeffersons, Judge Judy and Justice with Judge Jeanine.


Do you receive the same judge in double jeopardy?

(in the US) Double Jeopardy is prohibited by the US Constitution.


Can a deed be contested on the grounds of undue influence in Mississippi?

Yes but you need to provide compelling evidence to the court. The judge will review the evidence and issue a ruling.Yes but you need to provide compelling evidence to the court. The judge will review the evidence and issue a ruling.Yes but you need to provide compelling evidence to the court. The judge will review the evidence and issue a ruling.Yes but you need to provide compelling evidence to the court. The judge will review the evidence and issue a ruling.


Does double jeopardy mean using one set of criteria to judge others and a different criteria to judge ourselves?

Double jeopardy refers to being prosecuted for the same crime twice, which is typically not allowed due to constitutional protections against double jeopardy. It does not specifically refer to using different criteria to judge others versus ourselves.


How do I submit evidence for a judge trial for traffic court?

Take it with you. The judge will ask you questions and, if you need your evidence, show it to him then.


Can a judge close a case without seeing evidence?

No, a judge cannot close a case without seeing evidence. It is essential for a judge to review all relevant evidence before making a decision in a case.


A hit tv show that starts with ltter J?

Jeopardy, Judge Judy, Judge Joe Brown, Jersey Shore (hit?)...


There is little surviving evidence to judge Rome's accomplishments in the field of?

There is little surviving evidence to judge Rome's accomplishments in the field of music.


How do you get judge removed from after find guilty with no evidence?

Juvenile judge find me guilty no evidence just one the victim Asia but the victim witness said he wasn't me


Is it legal for a judge to refuse evidence in divorce court?

Yes, there are rules regarding how evidence must be brought to the court and admitted as evidence. So if you don't follow the rules the judge doesn't have to allow it.You have asked a complicated question and not provided any details.Briefly, the rules of evidence apply to criminal and civil proceedings and the judge is the person who governs the trial. In some cases a litigant may want to present some "proof" of something to the court and it doesn't rise to the level of evidence. To be admissible, evidence must be both relevant and material. There must be a relationship between the evidence and the issues in the case. If the "evidence" presented is not relevant the judge may decide to exclude it. A judge has final say on what is or is not admissible in their court. You need to ask your attorney to explain why the evidence was rejected. The judge should have provided a ruling on its merits.If you still want to pursue the matter you can file for an appeal and have the appeals court see if the judge's refusal of the evidence was justified. If you think the judge has a conflict of interest resulting from any personal interest in the case then you need to approach the higher court to request a transfer to another judge.


Can a judge refuse to look at evidence presented during a trial?

No, a judge cannot refuse to look at evidence presented during a trial. It is their responsibility to consider all relevant evidence in making a fair and just decision.