answersLogoWhite

0

The thirteenth amendment.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Prior to which amendment where salves counted as only three fifths of a person?

Prior to the 14th Amendment, slaves were counted as three-fifths of a person for the purposes of congressional representation and taxation, as established by the Three-Fifths Compromise in 1787. This compromise was part of the U.S. Constitution and reflected the contentious issue of slavery in the early United States. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, granted full citizenship and equal protection under the law to all persons born or naturalized in the U.S., effectively nullifying the three-fifths clause.


What was the debate between north south over counting slave population?

The three-fifths clause provided for counting three-fifths of all slaves for purposes of representation in Congress.


The three-fifths clause gave southern states the right to count each slave as?

citizens


What amendment made slaves count as one whole person?

The Three-Fifths Compromise, not an amendment, was established in the United States Constitution in 1787 determining that enslaved individuals would be counted as three-fifths of a person for both representation in Congress and taxation purposes.


How did the three fifths compromise end?

It was superseded and thereby rescinded by the 14th Amendment in 1868.


Which amendment made the three fifths compromise meaningless?

The Three-Fifths Compromise became meaningless with the ratification of the 14th Amendment in 1868. This amendment established that all persons born or naturalized in the United States are citizens and mandated equal protection under the law. It effectively disregarded the previous counting of enslaved individuals as three-fifths of a person for congressional representation, thereby affirming the principle of full citizenship for all individuals.


What amendment made the three-fifths compromise meaningless?

The Thirteenth Amendment, ratified in 1865, made the three-fifths compromise meaningless by abolishing slavery in the United States. The compromise, which counted enslaved people as three-fifths of a person for representation purposes, was rendered obsolete as it relied on the institution of slavery. With the abolition of slavery, there was no longer a need for such a compromise regarding representation in Congress.


What is the Three-Fifths Compromise usually referred to or called in the Constitution?

The Three-fifths Compromise was proposed by delegates James Wilson and Roger Sherman during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The three fifths clause stated that slaves counted as only three-fifths of a person.The three-fifths compromise was a strongly anti-slavery provision put into the Constitution. It was written in order to block the pro-slavery south from gaining additional representation in Congress by counting slaves as a full person for census purposes, even though the same slaves did not have the right to vote. It was added as Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3 to the United States Constitution. It is often referred to as the 3-5 clause, even though it was The Three-fifths Compromise.It was superceded and thereby rescinded or abolished by the 14th Amendment in 1868, which gave black Americans the same rights as all other citizens.


Did our original constitution outlaw slavery?

No, the original U.S. Constitution did not outlaw slavery. In fact, it included provisions that protected the institution of slavery, such as the Three-Fifths Compromise, which counted enslaved individuals as three-fifths of a person for representation purposes, and the Fugitive Slave Clause, which required escaped slaves to be returned to their owners. Slavery was not abolished in the United States until the 13th Amendment was ratified in 1865.


A proposed amendment to the Illinois Constitution must be approved by ____________.?

Three-fifths of all the voters during a general election


Discuss the irony of the Thirteenth Amendment repealing the Three-Fifths Compromise.?

There is no irony between the three fifths compromise and the 13th Amendment to the US Constitution. The former act was based on the number of slaves that existed in a State for the purposes of counting a State's population and therefore its number of seats in the Hose of Representatives. This was clearly put aside as the amendment abolished slavery.


When was the three-fifths compromise passed?

With the passage of the 13th Amendment the three fifths compromise became a moot point because slavery was abolished.However, the 14th Amendment explicitly addressed the question when it stated 'Representatives shall be apportioned...counting the whole numbers of persons in each state excluding Indians not taxed...'