0
What else can I help you with?
Why were slaves chained together?
Slaves were often chained together to prevent escape attempts and to make it more difficult for them to rebel or resist control. It was a brutal method used by slave owners to exert control and maintain dominance over their enslaved labor force.
Why was there need for slaves?
There wasn't.My versionSince the first city state the prosperity of the rich has depended on cheap and dependable labour. In the early days of the USA for example, the use of slaves lowered the cost of farming to the point that the landholders could make a profit.People who did not own slaves could not financially compete and thus could not become more wealthy.So the need was driven by the financial need to make a profit.UNTIL the whole economy had to stop the use of slaves at once, the fact that it was legal and your business would not be viable made the "NEED". Once everyone can not own slaves then the NEED goes away.
Change or addition to the constitution?
Amendments to the constitution must uphold the principles of democracy, equality, and human rights. Any changes should be carefully considered to ensure they benefit society as a whole and protect the fundamental rights of all citizens.
Why did slavery end answers for kids?
The common misconception is that it ended (in the US) when Abraham Why_did_slavery_endSigned and approved the emancipation Proclamation.This is, however, wrong. The Emancipation Proclamation only officially ended slavery for slaves in "rebellious" states... i.e. just those that denied that the government of which Lincoln was president had any power over them.It did have one immediate effect: the Union Army stopped treating captured slaves as "contraband enemy property" and began immediately freeing them. However, slavery didn't officially end in the US as a whole until December 6, 1865, when Why_did_slavery_endratified the 13th Amendment pushing it over the requirement of ratification by at least 3/4 of the states and making it a part of the US Constitution.It also might be noted that while the 13th amendment freed slaves in general, it expressly permits involuntary servitude as punishment for crimes. Slavery in that sense is technically still constitutional under US law, though it's since been abolished by all states individually with the last being Why_did_slavery_endin 1927.It is still endemic in many parts of the world.
Why did the southerners feel the way they did about the Fugitive slave law?
The fugitive slave law gave southerners some protection against being bankrupted by thousands of escaping slaves. The law gave northern banks greater willingness to support slavery by loaning money to slave owners. The law also had the effect of co-opting the support of northern newspapers, which carried the very profitable ads for return of escaped slaves. Basically, the fugitive slave act gave national endorsement to the whole system of slavery.
Which amendment counted slaves as one whole person for the puropses of representation in the US house of representatives?
Amendment XIV
What amendment made former slaves counted as one whole person for the purposes of representation in the US House of Representatives?
Amendment 14 1868 section 2
How did the Constitutional Conversation reach a compromise on the issue of slavery?
They really didn’t. The compromise came in counting the slaves as 3/4 of a person instead as a whole person because it set the number of House members. Had the southern states been able to count slaves as a whole person they would have had more power in the government, but the issue of slavery itself was left to the future.
Slaves where better in Latin America than British America?
there was no segregation and freedom could thus be ensured far easier. check john Locke's 110th amendment of constitution and consider the whole idea of property, in british America slaves were merely property, in latin America slaves were people.
Why was the Three-Fifths Comprimise necessary?
The three-fifths compromise was necessary in order to gain the support of both the Northern and Southern states for how slaves would be counted for the purpose of apportioning representation in the U.S. House of Representatives. Taxation was also affected by this apportionment but the main issue was representation. If slaves were counted as a whole person, the South would have a larger representation; if slaves didn't count at all, the North would have a larger representation. So to satisfy each side, the Constitution stated that slaves would be counted as 3/5ths of a person; a compromise between the two extremes.
What was the goal of the three fifths compromise?
The three-fifths compromise was necessary in order to gain the support of both the Northern and Southern states for how slaves would be counted for the purpose of apportioning representation in the U.S. House of Representatives. Taxation was also affected by this apportionment but the main issue was representation. If slaves were counted as a whole person, the South would have a larger representation; if slaves didn't count at all, the North would have a larger representation. So to satisfy each side, the Constitution stated that slaves would be counted as 3/5ths of a person; a compromise between the two extremes.
Did the passage of the fifteenth amendment mark the end of the American anti-slavery society as its work was now complete?
No. The anti slavery movement found completion of its goals with the passage of the 13th Amendment and both the 14th and 15th Amendment are wholly unnecessary. The 15th Amendment seeks to grant former slaves the right to vote, yet being free and emancipated by the 13th Amendment those former slaves, who all ready possessed natural rights even before the passage of the 13th Amendment did not need a 15th Amendment to guarantee them the right to vote. Being a whole person as opposed to a "three fifths" person should have solidified the former slaves opportunity to vote. If they were being denied that opportunity by criminals who sought to prevent the former slaves from being free, a simple law prohibiting such activities would have sufficed. Amendments are found in the Bill of Rights where certain natural rights are acknowledged and not granted, that is until the passage of the 14th and 15th Amendments. These two Amendments are horrible and bungled attempts to rectify the "three fifths" nonsense, but the 13th Amendment all ready did this. Now we have two examples of legal precedent where the government is granting to people the natural rights they all ready possessed.
Agreement that slaves would not be counted as a whole person when determining representation?
The Three-Fifths Compromise if i'm not mistaken. It counted slaves as 3/5 of a person when determining the amount of representatives a state received in congress (based on population)
How much of a person would black people count?
Black people today and in the past count as the whole person they are. The claim that they were worth 3/5 of a white person is not true. The Constitution counted them as 3/5 toward representation, which was a compromise between those who didn't want them represented and those who thought they should count fully.
Was Harriet Tubman family slaves?
Her and her whole family grew up as slaves.
How did the southern states bypass the 13th amendment?
Amendment XIII (13) abolished slavery, which was a huge factor of the Southern United States' economy. The Southern United States relied on slaves to work many large plantations and farms the grew primarily cotton, but also grains, tobacco, and many other cash crops. The 13th amendment also did not repay slave owners for their slaves; many plantation owners were now left with huge plots of land and no one to work them, and their whole lives' worth of investments (their slaves) were gone. Slaves were very expensive -- nearing $1750, which would be the equivalent of around $40,000 in today's money.
What does the condutor do in the underground railroad?
a conductor is a person who helps the slaves travel (Underground railroad)with out getting caught by the slave catchers who will bring them or other native-amaicin people who have never been slaves their whole life
