A ruling or a type of law once prevelant in the United Kingdom and not elsewhere that is out-moded nowadays.
See below link - and other entries in several search engines for more information.
Peter Benson Maxwell has written: 'On the interpretation of statutes' -- subject(s): Interpretation and construction, Law, Statutes 'The interpretation of statutes' -- subject(s): Interpretation and construction, Law, Statutes
what is the objective of statutory interpretation
object of interpretation of statutes are as follows: 1. codifying statute 2.consolditating statute 3.declaratory statute
Z. A. Channa has written: 'The interpretation of statutes' -- subject(s): Interpretation and construction, Law
The literal rule interprets statutes based on the plain, ordinary meaning of the words used, applying them strictly as written, regardless of the consequences. In contrast, the golden rule allows for a more flexible interpretation, permitting deviations from the literal meaning to avoid absurd or unjust outcomes. While the literal rule emphasizes textual clarity, the golden rule seeks to balance clarity with fairness in legal interpretation. Thus, the golden rule acts as a corrective mechanism to the potential rigidity of the literal rule.
No- only the supreme court of the US can rule on the constitutionality of statutes.
Statutes passed by U.S. Congress are typically general in nature. The words used in the statute need to be applied to particular circumstance, cases. Attorneys argue about proper interpretation of statutes. When an appeals court decides which interpretation is correct, that ruling stands as a valid interpretation until a higher court decides otherwise. The interpretation of a statute becomes the law of the land.
I would rule the world with an iron fist. MMUUWAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!!!
Whether in a debate or a courtroom, the Interpretation Rule is to withhold all judgements of merit until the argument is fully developed and understood accurately.
No. One of the functions of courts is to apply the statutes to the facts of a particular case.
There isn't a widely known rule or principle called the Germaine Rule. It is possible that you may be referring to the "Germain Rule", which is a principle of statutory interpretation used in legal cases. This rule states that when multiple statutes or laws are potentially applicable to a situation, the more specific statute should be applied over the more general one. However, without more context it is difficult to provide a more precise answer.
The Interpretation of Laws Act is crucial for understanding statutes as it provides guidelines on how to interpret legal texts, ensuring consistency and clarity in legal reasoning. It establishes rules regarding the meanings of words, phrases, and provisions, helping to avoid ambiguity and misinterpretation. By outlining principles such as the intention of the legislature and the context within which laws are enacted, the Act aids courts and practitioners in applying statutes correctly. Ultimately, it serves to uphold the rule of law and promote justice by ensuring that laws are understood and enforced as intended.