Missouri's RSMO 565.156-1(5) passed:
1. A person commits the crime of child abduction if he or she:
(5) Having legal custody of the child pursuant to a valid court order, removes, takes, detains, conceals or entices away that child within or without the state, without good cause, and with the intent to deprive the custody or visitation rights of another person.
2. Child abduction is a class D felony.
The father should consult with an attorney but unless he has been declared an unfit parent by the court with jurisdiction over the child, or he has given up his parental rights, he would be the primary choice for custody of the child.The father should consult with an attorney but unless he has been declared an unfit parent by the court with jurisdiction over the child, or he has given up his parental rights, he would be the primary choice for custody of the child.The father should consult with an attorney but unless he has been declared an unfit parent by the court with jurisdiction over the child, or he has given up his parental rights, he would be the primary choice for custody of the child.The father should consult with an attorney but unless he has been declared an unfit parent by the court with jurisdiction over the child, or he has given up his parental rights, he would be the primary choice for custody of the child.
In most states that's considered parental abduction if you have primary residential.
No! Kidnapping involves other elements that make it a crime. The events described above mean a contempt of court, violation of custody agreement etc.
This is an issue that is not specifically addressed in custody laws, so it needs to be addressed in a modified custody order. See link for addressing other issues.
Yes, if:- The father retains sole physical custody of the child, the mother has visitation rights and took the child out-of-state during a time she did NOT have visitation with the child; OR- The father retains sole physical custody of the child, the mother has absolutely no parental rights to the child and took the child out-of-state at any time.No, if:- There is a custody arrangement in place, whether as a written or oral agreement between the her and the father, or as an Order for Child Custody, and the mother retains primary or joint (equally shared) physical custody of the child; OR- There is no custody arrangement in place between her and the father, and there is no Order for Child Custody in place, but she retains primary or sole physical custody of the child and/or the father never bothered to petition for custody; OR- There is a custody agreement in place between her and the father, or there is an Order for Child Custody, and the father retains primary or sole physical custody of the child, IF the mother has visitation rights and chose to take the child out-of-state while she had visitation with the child;- Just about any other scenario, other than the two described above under "yes," not otherwise described here.To sum this up, no, the mother probably cannot be charged with parental kidnapping simply for taking her child out of state. The mother has a legal right to travel wherever she chooses with her child unless a court tells her otherwise. In fact, the mother may move out-of-state with the child permanently if she so chooses, and there is nothing the father can do.The fact that the mother and the father were never married is completely irrelevant. The only difference between unmarried parents and divorced parents, is that divorced parents usually submit a custody plan to (or, more often, one parent receives an Order for Primary Physical Custody from) the family court, which explicitly outlines which parent has custody and which has visitation. If the parents never married, and the child lives with the mother, she is the custodial parent (which means she has primary physical custody of the child) and she can take the child wherever she pleases, whenever she wishes. The father has no legal claim to or right to control how the mother cares for the child while she retains custody, and the mother is certainly not required to seek permission or even notify the father of her intent to leave the state with her child so long as she retains custody,
depends on how the court papers read. who has custody? No, it might be depending upon circumstances considered parental abduction, but if the father knew where the child was, it is unlikely that such a charge could be upheld. If the father has sole or primary custody he could report it as a commission of a crime and seek prosecutory action. Or he could petition the court for a writ of habeas corpus to have the child returned to his custody. Basically the mother could be held in direct contempt of a court order, unless she could show "just cause" as to her actions. Such as substantiated evidence of the child having been subjected to neglect and/or physical or emotional abuse. If the child was taken across state lines the case could become a bit more complicated, but kidnapping would not be a consideration pertaining to any criminal charges.
No. You were not ordered to give of your custody rights, just primary residency was transferred to the father. You still have your parental rights, the same as a father, and responsibility to pay child support, whether the father wants it or not.
Yes.Yes.Yes.Yes.
no
Fathers are frequently ordered to do so there, despite having primary custody. see link below
If you have primary custody you rule the child's life. You're the parent in charge but the other parent may still be entitled visitation.
By determining that the right of a parent to primary custody of the child supersedes the best interest of the child.