There isn't one. Article 3 of the US Constitution enables the judiciary to interpret laws. That's why you have so many Justices in the Supreme Court who have varying views on how to interpret the Constitution. For example, Justice Scalia is known to be one who thinks the Constitution isn't flexible, while Ginsberg is generally for flexibility.
Cartilage is the flexible tissue that supports your nose.
Why did Franklin. Support the constitution
the answer is separation of powers
the elastic clause
Hyaline cartilage supports the trachea walls. It is very strong but also flexible and elastic, and it has the appearance of frosted glass.
It is called a spine. That actually makes the animal a vertebrate.
I believe it's a spine or backbone.
Yes, the U.S. Constitution allows citizens to abolish a corrupt government through various means, primarily through the principles of popular sovereignty and the right to alter or abolish government as outlined in the Declaration of Independence. Citizens can express their will through voting, peaceful protests, and advocacy for constitutional amendments. If government becomes destructive to the rights of the people, the Constitution supports the idea that citizens have the right to seek change. However, the specific process for doing so must adhere to constitutional law and democratic principles.
Nothing. The president supports and has pledged to defend the Constitution. He was also a professor of constitutional law for nearly twelve years, so he understands what is in the Constitution. Beware of political rhetoric on talk shows, where they make unproven or untrue accusations about the president just to get ratings. Disagreeing with the policies of any president (whether it was President Bush then or President Obama now) does not prove that the president is "against" the constitution.
There is no Constitutional basis for Medicare. Its proponents CLAIM that the Congress's power to "... providefor the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States;" [emphasis mine], as enumerated in Article I, Section 8, is the Constitutional authority for Medicare. However, Medicare is clearly targeted at a specific group of people, specifically the elderly, and is denied to anyone who is not a member of that group, and therefore, it has nothing to do with the general welfare.The above answer is silly. Medicare has successfully survived all court challenges and just because this originator want s Medicare to be unconstitutional, doesn't make it so. The elastic clause of the constitution is quite broad.I'm sorry, but, where is this "elastic clause"? I'm not aware of Medicare being challenged in court, but if it was, it survived only because the federal courts no longer follow the Constitution, any more than the rest of the federal government.
Limited Government
The new constitution was supported by the Federalists. The Federalist Papers has a compilation of 85 essays complied by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay.