0
What is the federal law requiring employers to permit employees to continue their group health insurance coverage after termination?
The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act or COBRA is what you are referencing. It allows you to keep your group coverage for a specific period of time provided you pay the premiums.
One very important point here that most people do not know. If you have a family that was covered on the group plan each is eligible independently, you do not have to enroll he whole group. Lilkewise you do not have o enroll the employee but can still enroll the dependents.
Say you have a dependent with ongoing medical needs but you are in good health and are willing to run the risk of going without coverage (NOT something I recommend). You can enroll that dependent only and drop coverage for yourself.
Also you have 60 days to enroll so take that time to look around for other options.
What else can I help you with?
How long will employer pay for your medical insurance after termination?
Unless you have some contractual agreement requiring them to do so, an employer is not obligated to pay for any of your insurance after termination. You will have the right to continue coverage under HIPAA at your expense however.
Is it illegal to have company policy requiring people to retire at a certain age?
It is lawful for all non-government employers with fewer than 20 employees: most US employers.
Does the federal government does not require employees to contribute to workers compensation insurance?
The federal government does not require employees to contribute to workers' compensation insurance; instead, it is generally the responsibility of employers to provide this coverage for their employees. Workers' compensation is designed to protect workers by offering benefits for work-related injuries or illnesses without requiring employee contributions. However, specific requirements can vary by state, as each state administers its own workers' compensation program.
When was liberty mutual founded?
Liberty Mutual was founded in 1912 as the Massachusetts Employees' Insurance Association (MEIA), following passage of a Massachusetts state law requiring employers to protect their employees with workers' compensation insurance in 1911.[10]The first branch office was opened in 1914, and later that year, the company wrote its first automobile insurance policy. The company was founded as a Massachusetts Mutual Company, where its insureds have ownership in the company. The name was changed in 1917 to the Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, and through partnerships, the company began offering full-coverage auto policies.
Can an employeer hold your paycheck with no reason?
No, employers are generally required to compensate you for the work that you have done. Even if the employer was to lay you off, they still should issue a final paycheck for the work that you have done previously.
What percentage of company employees must take part in a noncontributory life insurance policy?
In a noncontributory life insurance policy, typically 100% of eligible employees must participate, as the employer pays the full premium without requiring contributions from employees. This ensures that all covered employees receive the benefit without any cost to them. However, specific requirements can vary by company policy and insurance provider, so it's essential to check the terms of the policy in question.
is it true that the company that is letting you go has to pay 60% of the insurance cost or the fact is we have been paying $250.00 a month and the insurance cost $1000.00?
For a short time period the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is requiring employers to notify employees being terminated that they are eligible to have their health insurance continue under COBRA and be subsidized up to 65% for approximately 9 months. This is a temporary stimulus condition in the federal stimulus law to help people who are being laid off still hold on to their health insurance for a while.
Where can one purchase term life insurance that involves no physical?
Many companies offer life insurance to new employees without requiring a physical. If that is not an option, then Mutual of Omaha also offers policies that do not require a physical, but the policies do have age restrictions.
What can osha do about bedbug in the work place?
OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) can address bedbug infestations in the workplace by ensuring that employers maintain a safe and sanitary environment for employees. While OSHA does not have specific regulations for bedbugs, it can enforce general duty clauses requiring employers to keep the workplace free from recognized hazards. Employers may be required to implement pest control measures, educate employees about prevention, and respond promptly to reported infestations to protect worker health and safety.
What is a noncontributory group life insurance plan?
A noncontributory group life insurance plan is a type of coverage offered by an employer where the premiums are paid entirely by the employer, meaning employees do not contribute financially. This type of plan typically provides a basic level of life insurance coverage to all eligible employees without requiring them to enroll or pay premiums. Noncontributory plans can enhance employee benefits and attract talent, as they offer a financial safety net at no cost to the employees.
What does the law requiring mandatory car insurance state?
The law requiring mandatory car insurance states that individuals and businesses are required by law to possess valid auto mobile insurance designed to cover the risk of financial liability in the event of an accident.
Do you think it is inconsistent with Protection against Pregnancy Discrimination Act?
Consider the following fictional scenario. The Commonwealth passes the Protection against Pregnancy Discrimination Act. This Act requires employers to treat pregnancy the same as any other disability. The NSW Parliament subsequently passes the Pregnant Employees' Leave Act which requires employers to give pregnant employees three months' paid maternity leave. There are no NSW laws requiring employers to provide paid leave to other employees who are temporarily unable to work. An employer channeling's the Pregnant Employees Leave Act (NSW) on the ground that it gives pregnancy preferential treatment and is therefore inconsistent with the Protection against Pregnancy Discrimination Act(Cth). Do you think it is inconsistent? Argue for your view, supporting your answer by reference to relevant feminist theories.
