answersLogoWhite

0

In parliamentary language, the term 'closure' is used to signify when the government wants to force the debate on a particular bill to end by a certain date and time. It is usually enforced when the opposition parties strongly object to one or more measures in the bill, and raise their objections at every available opportunity. It is not used simply to end a filibuster. Filibusters are rare in the parliamentary system. They tend to run out of steam quickly and on their own. 'Closure' is usually met with a hue and cry by the opposition parties, who accuse the government of muzzling parliament, stifling debate, and generally acting in an undemocratic manner. The term 'guillotine' is invariably used by the opposition, in reference to the government. There is a well developed vituperative vocabulary readily available to hurl at the government upon the slightest indication of closure. Journalists, of course, have a field day. Closure often gives new life to the issue at hand, brings the topic to the public's attention, and makes the government look bad. Therefore, it is seldom used. It also tends to heighten any hostilities between the government and opposition, and as such results in a spillover effect, where the opposition parties debate other bills more strenuously. When closure is invoked, it generally results in a 'lose-lose' situation for the government. Governments tend to prefer extending the time for debate, by scheduling morning and evening sittings of parliament, rather than invoking closure. The most memorable abuse of closure occurred in the Canadian House of Commons in 1956 over the debate on the proposed Trans-Canada Pipeline, and is thought to have been the primary reason the government was defeated at the polls the following year.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What may end debate on a bill on the floor of the house?

motion to end debate


What is a procedure that may be used to limit or end floor debate in a legislative body?

Cloture


Limit on the debate of a bill in the senate?

If the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is part of the majority, he or she gets to write the _______.


How do you end debate on a bill in the Senate before everyone is ready to do so?

AnswerThe President of the Senate decides when debate ends.AnswerUnder most circumstances, debate is forced to end by cloture, meaning the Senate votes whether to end the debate. Cloture requires 60 votes (three-fifths of the Senate) to be successful, and is followed by an up or down vote on the issue being debated.If the other party is engaged in a filibuster (rather than simple debate), a two-thirds majority vote is required to end the filibuster.The President of the Senate (who is also the Vice-President of the United States) or, in his (or her) absence, the president pro tempore, may conclude the debate ifthose wishing to end discussion exercise the nuclear option-- and special circumstances apply. Under Senate Rule 22, if a Senator calls for a "point of order" that can be upheld on constitutional grounds, the presiding officer of the Senate decides whether the Constitution supports the Senator's reasoning calling for a vote. Otherwise, the presiding officer can uphold a point of order on procedural grounds, but the Senate can vote to override his (or her) decision.So, technically, the President of the Senate can only "end" the vote on constitutional grounds, but one of the Senators has to initiate the process and justify its use.[But don't worry; the latter scenario is uncommon.]


How many votes does it take to invoke cloture in the senate?

60% of those voting are needed to stop debate on ordinary legislation. (2/3 are needed to end debate on senate rules and only 51% are needed to close debate on presidential appointments, other than for supreme court justices.)


What is the meaning of the word cloture?

Cloture is a parliamentary procedure used in the U.S. Senate to end a debate and proceed to a vote on a bill. It requires a three-fifths majority (60 votes) to invoke cloture and limit further debate.


What is the cloture rule?

It is is a motion or process aimed at bringing debate to a quick end, and is used to prevent a fillibust.


How long does a filibuster have to be to force a super-majority in the Senate?

A filibuster does not have a specific duration; rather, it is a tactic used to prolong debate and delay or block a vote on legislation. In the Senate, a filibuster can effectively require a supermajority of 60 votes to end debate and proceed to a vote, regardless of how long the debate continues. Typically, senators may engage in extended speech or procedural maneuvers to maintain the filibuster until a sufficient number of votes can be secured to overcome it.


What is the term for a means to limit debate?

The term for a means to limit debate is "cloture." In legislative contexts, particularly in the U.S. Senate, cloture is a procedure used to bring a debate to a quick end and proceed to a vote, requiring a certain number of votes to pass. This mechanism helps prevent filibustering and allows legislative bodies to manage their time effectively.


What describes a cloture rule?

The cloture rule is a way to end a filibuster in Congress. A minimum of 16 senators must sign the petition and three-fifths of the Senate must vote to pass it.


How many seats are needed for a filibuster proof Senate?

In the United States Senate, there needs to be 60 Senators who vote to end all discussion or debate about a given bill or issue and have it move to a floor vote. The United States House of Representatives do not allow filibusters, since each member has a time limit on how much they can speak (or stall) about a piece of legislation. Filibusters can occur in the Senate for as long as there is are no group of 60 Senators who vote to stop them.


What stops a fillibuster?

In the United States Senate, the rule used to stop a filibuster is called "cloture." With the approval of three-fifths of the sitting Senators, this rule sets a limit on how long the Senate can continue to debate a bill or other proposal before voting on it.