answersLogoWhite

0

Amendment I

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

This Amendment was also applied to the states under the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection clause (they cannot make unconstitutional laws infringing free speech).

The Bill of Rights does not confer absolute and unconditional freedom of expression; there are certain types of speech, such as defamation, slander and libel (under most circumstances) and perjury that are not protected under the Constitution.

Other restrictions apply to speech that incites people to break the law. The Supreme Court held in Bradenburg v. Ohio,(1969) that speech creating imminent danger to others is not protected under the First Amendment.

The Court set the Brandenburg standard as the result of a Ku Klux Klan parade and rally held in that town. Ohio charged the group's leader, Clarence Brandenburg, with advocating violence under Ohio's Criminal Syndicalism statute because of the hate speech, racial and ethnic epithets, for advocating violence, and for assembling a group for the purpose of "teaching criminal syndicalism."

Brandenburg was found guilty in the Ohio courts, but the US Supreme Court overturned his conviction and nullified Ohio's criminal syndicalism statute as unconstitutional. The per curiam (unsigned) decision held that the government could not punish hate speech or abstract discussions of violence. According to the Court, the first amendment right can only be abridged if three elements of speech: "intent," "imminence," and "likelihood" create a situation resulting in "imminent lawless action" (for example, if the speaker intentionally motivates the listeners to break the law immediately and they do or appear ready to). Lawless action could take many forms: rioting, vandalism, committing hate crimes, etc.

The relevant part of the Brandenburg opinion reads:

"These later decisions have fashioned the principle that the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action."

Case Citation:

Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 US 444 (1969)

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What did supreme court decide in schenck v the US?

Limits to free speech were constitutional during national emergencies.


What are consequences people risk when they refuse to respect the limits placed on freedom of speech and freedom of the press?

They could be placed in jail.


The manga carta established the rights of?

It established the rights of peasants to have free religion, more free speech, although not as much as today, and placed limits on royal power. It also provided an early system of representatives.


What is the limits of free speech?

Free speech in America ends when what you are saying is illegal. Something that is threatening or dangerous is illegal, like screaming "Fire!" in a crowded theatre. The limits of free speech are defined by the government. For example, under Mao, speaking against the government was punishable by death.


When and why are limits placed on rights?

There isn't always a specific time on when there are limits placed on rights. There is however a reason why there are limits placed on rights. Limits can be placed on rights because of laws. Limits can also be placed on rights because of society standards.


What are the possible consequences people risk to respect the limits placed on freedom of speech and freedom of the press?

i dont know help me


When and why are limits on rights?

There isn't always a specific time on when there are limits placed on rights. There is however a reason why there are limits placed on rights. Limits can be placed on rights because of laws. Limits can also be placed on rights because of society standards.


What are the possible consequences people risk when they refuse to respect the limits placed on freedom of speech and freedom of press?

Some people and organizations do not respect freedom of speech or freedom of press. These people can be prosecuted and jailed.


What are some common questions about freedom of speech?

Common questions about freedom of speech include: What are the limits of free speech? Can hate speech be protected under the First Amendment? How does freedom of speech apply to social media and the internet?


What limits are placed on student speech?

Limitations on student speech in a school setting generally involve restrictions on speech that disrupts the learning environment, promotes violence or illegal activity, or is considered obscene or defamatory. Schools can also regulate speech that is deemed to be disrespectful or discriminatory towards others. Students do have free speech rights, but these rights can be limited in certain circumstances to ensure the safety and well-being of the school community.


What does this timeline show about the role of the Supreme Court in defining limits on free speech?

It shows that the Supreme Court can set new rules for free speech if the Court feels circumstances require it. -Apex 4.1.4


What did the supreme court decide in schench v. the US?

Limits to free speech were constitutional during national emergencies